PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PGJ vs. YXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PGJ vs. YXI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PGJ (Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF) and YXI (ProShares Short FTSE China 50) are both exchange-traded funds - PGJ is a China Equities fund tracking the Halter USX China Index, while YXI is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PGJ returned 0.21%/yr vs -8.18%/yr for YXI. At a correlation of -0.76, they often move in opposite directions. PGJ charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YXI.

Performance

PGJ vs. YXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGJ achieves a -11.48% return, which is significantly lower than YXI's 7.60% return. Over the past 10 years, PGJ has outperformed YXI with an annualized return of 0.21%, while YXI has yielded a comparatively lower -8.18% annualized return.

PGJ

1D
-0.55%
1M
-4.23%
YTD
-11.48%
6M
-13.73%
1Y
-7.05%
3Y*
2.92%
5Y*
-13.73%
10Y*
0.21%

YXI

1D
-0.56%
1M
2.15%
YTD
7.60%
6M
9.50%
1Y
1.04%
3Y*
-11.86%
5Y*
-2.76%
10Y*
-8.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGJ vs. YXI - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF		-11.48%13.66%5.91%-2.38%-24.50%-42.87%54.24%32.18%-29.51%60.27%
YXI
ProShares Short FTSE China 50		7.60%-22.87%-25.36%12.40%4.78%13.94%-17.95%-14.35%9.63%-28.43%

Correlation

The correlation between PGJ and YXI is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2010

-0.76

The correlation between PGJ and YXI shifts across timeframes, from -0.87 (5 years) to -0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF

ProShares Short FTSE China 50

Often compared with PGJ:
PGJ vs. KWEBPGJ vs. CQQQPGJ vs. FXIPGJ vs. MCHIPGJ vs. CXSEPGJ vs. CHIQPGJ vs. VOO
Often compared with YXI:
YXI vs. FXPYXI vs. KWEBYXI vs. SPYYXI vs. CNYAYXI vs. EWTYXI vs. MCHIYXI vs. FXI

Return for Risk

PGJ vs. YXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PGJ
PGJ Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PGJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGJ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PGJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGJ Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
YXI
YXI Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
YXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
YXI Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
YXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
YXI Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGJ vs. YXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

PGJYXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.29
0.05

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.26
0.22

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.03

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

0.07

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.52

0.13

-0.66

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PGJ vs. YXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGJ Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the YXI Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGJ and YXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

PGJYXIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

0.05

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

-0.09

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

-0.30

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

-0.30

+0.42

Drawdowns

PGJ vs. YXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGJ drawdown since its inception was -78.37%, roughly equal to the maximum YXI drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGJ and YXI.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PGJYXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.37%

-81.15%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.69%

-14.21%

-11.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.82%

-53.12%

+22.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.00%

-57.65%

-12.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.37%

-64.92%

-13.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.25%

-78.03%

+11.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.74%

-54.31%

+22.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.49%

7.79%

+5.70%

Volatility

PGJ vs. YXI - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) at 7.25%. This indicates that PGJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PGJYXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.54%

7.25%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.28%

14.87%

+2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.46%

19.93%

+4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.73%

31.39%

+12.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.69%

27.42%

+9.27%

PGJ vs. YXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGJ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than YXI's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

PGJ vs. YXI - Dividend Comparison

PGJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than YXI's 2.85% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF		3.58%3.38%4.70%2.50%0.84%0.00%0.30%0.17%0.31%2.05%1.94%0.37%
YXI
ProShares Short FTSE China 50		2.85%3.60%4.35%2.66%0.27%0.00%0.08%1.01%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

PGJ and YXI have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGJ has higher volatility (8.54%) compared to YXI (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGJ dropped -78.37% vs YXI's -81.15%.

On 10-year performance, PGJ leads with 0.21% vs -8.18% for YXI. On fees, PGJ is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, YXI has been the lower-risk option at 7.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PGJ has performed better with a 0.21% return vs -8.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PGJ is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YXI.

PGJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 2.85% for YXI.

PGJ is categorized as China Equities, while YXI is Inverse Equities. PGJ tracks Halter USX China Index, while YXI tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for PGJ and 0.95% for YXI.

YXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGJ and YXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer