PGJ vs. YXI
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI).
PGJ and YXI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PGJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Halter USX China Index. It was launched on Dec 9, 2004. YXI is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). It was launched on Mar 16, 2010. Both PGJ and YXI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PGJ vs. YXI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PGJ vs. YXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | -10.21% | 13.66% | 5.91% | -2.38% | -24.50% | -42.87% | 54.24% | 32.18% | -29.51% | 60.27% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 7.67% | -22.87% | -25.36% | 12.40% | 4.78% | 13.94% | -17.95% | -14.35% | 9.63% | -28.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGJ achieves a -10.21% return, which is significantly lower than YXI's 7.67% return. Over the past 10 years, PGJ has outperformed YXI with an annualized return of 0.21%, while YXI has yielded a comparatively lower -8.46% annualized return.
PGJ
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- YTD
- -10.21%
- 6M
- -23.60%
- 1Y
- -10.32%
- 3Y*
- -0.75%
- 5Y*
- -14.90%
- 10Y*
- 0.21%
YXI
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 7.67%
- 6M
- 15.61%
- 1Y
- -2.11%
- 3Y*
- -9.66%
- 5Y*
- -2.70%
- 10Y*
- -8.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PGJ vs. YXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGJ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than YXI's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PGJ vs. YXI — Risk / Return Rank
PGJ
YXI
PGJ vs. YXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGJ | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | -0.09 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | 0.04 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.01 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | -0.06 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | -0.08 | -0.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGJ | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.38 | -0.09 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | -0.09 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 | -0.31 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | -0.31 | +0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between PGJ and YXI is -0.76. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
PGJ vs. YXI - Dividend Comparison
PGJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than YXI's 2.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | 3.53% | 3.38% | 4.70% | 2.50% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 2.05% | 1.94% | 0.37% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 2.85% | 3.60% | 4.35% | 2.66% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.01% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PGJ vs. YXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGJ drawdown since its inception was -78.37%, roughly equal to the maximum YXI drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGJ and YXI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGJ | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.37% | -81.15% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.69% | -29.83% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.28% | -57.65% | -14.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.37% | -66.81% | -11.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.77% | -78.02% | +12.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.48% | -54.05% | +22.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.79% | 22.96% | -12.17% |
Volatility
PGJ vs. YXI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) have volatilities of 7.15% and 7.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PGJ | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.15% | 7.48% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.70% | 14.80% | +2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.38% | 23.78% | +3.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.89% | 31.35% | +12.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.62% | 27.46% | +9.16% |