PGJ vs. KTEC

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

PGJ (Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF) and KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) are both China Equities funds - PGJ tracks the Halter USX China Index while KTEC tracks the Hang Seng Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PGJ returned -16.10%/yr vs -13.51%/yr for KTEC. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PGJ charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KTEC.

Performance

PGJ vs. KTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PGJ having a -23.70% return and KTEC slightly higher at -23.37%.

PGJ

• 1D: -2.80%
• 1M: -12.94%
• YTD: -23.70%
• 6M: -24.84%
• 1Y: -21.34%
• 3Y*: -2.41%
• 5Y*: -16.10%
• 10Y*: -0.29%

KTEC

• 1D: -2.20%
• 1M: -12.41%
• YTD: -23.37%
• 6M: -24.10%
• 1Y: -23.00%
• 3Y*: 1.72%
• 5Y*: -13.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGJ vs. KTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF	-23.70%	13.66%	5.91%	-2.38%	-24.50%	-38.20%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	-23.37%	21.01%	16.13%	-10.41%	-26.12%	-29.98%

Correlation

The correlation between PGJ and KTEC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021	0.91

The correlation between PGJ and KTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

PGJ vs. KTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PGJ	KTEC
Consumer Cyclical	44.4%	45.1%
Communication Services	26.3%	28.2%
Technology	11.4%	24.5%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	-
Financial Services	3.9%	-
Real Estate	3.1%	-
Industrials	2.6%	-
Energy	2.1%	-
Healthcare	0.7%	2.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PGJ vs. KTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGJ

PGJ Risk / Return Rank: 3
PGJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
PGJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
PGJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
PGJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
PGJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

KTEC

KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 3
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 3
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGJ vs. KTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PGJ	KTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.88	-0.83	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.20	-1.13	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	0.88	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.61	-0.63	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	-1.28	-0.12

PGJ vs. KTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGJ Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is comparable to the KTEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGJ and KTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PGJ vs. KTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGJ drawdown since its inception was -78.37%, which is greater than KTEC's maximum drawdown of -66.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGJ and KTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PGJ	KTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.37%	-66.90%	-11.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.08%	-36.46%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.08%	-36.46%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-70.00%	-66.90%	-3.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.91%	-51.64%	-19.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.83%	-43.98%	+12.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.21%	17.96%	-2.75%

Volatility

PGJ vs. KTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) is 6.66%, while KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that PGJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PGJ	KTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.66%	7.78%	-1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.82%	20.92%	-3.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.38%	27.69%	-3.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.77%	43.20%	+0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.71%	43.03%	-6.32%

PGJ vs. KTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGJ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than KTEC's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

PGJ vs. KTEC - Dividend Comparison

PGJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than KTEC's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	4.38%	3.36%	0.27%	0.81%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF	3.50%	3.38%	4.70%	2.50%	0.84%	0.00%	0.30%	0.17%	0.31%	2.05%	1.94%	0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PGJ and KTEC in my portfolio?

PGJ and KTEC have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PGJ or KTEC?

KTEC has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to PGJ (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGJ dropped -78.37% vs KTEC's -66.90%.

Which ETF is better, PGJ or KTEC?

On 5-year performance, KTEC leads with -13.51% vs -16.10% for PGJ. On fees, KTEC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, PGJ has been the lower-risk option at 6.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PGJ or KTEC?

Over the 5-year period, KTEC has performed better with a -13.51% return vs -16.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PGJ or KTEC?

KTEC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for PGJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PGJ or KTEC?

KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 3.50% for PGJ.

What is the main difference between PGJ and KTEC?

PGJ tracks Halter USX China Index, while KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for PGJ and 0.69% for KTEC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.83 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.