PGIIX vs. VMVFX
PGIIX (Polen Global Growth Fund) and VMVFX (Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PGIIX returned 10.40%/yr vs 9.65%/yr for VMVFX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PGIIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for VMVFX.
Performance
PGIIX vs. VMVFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGIIX achieves a -9.63% return, which is significantly lower than VMVFX's 8.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PGIIX has outperformed VMVFX with an annualized return of 10.40%, while VMVFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.65% annualized return.
PGIIX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -3.27%
- YTD
- -9.63%
- 6M
- -10.31%
- 1Y
- -8.35%
- 3Y*
- 5.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
VMVFX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 7.63%
- 1Y
- 13.49%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
PGIIX vs. VMVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGIIX Polen Global Growth Fund | -9.63% | 1.91% | 16.43% | 31.09% | -31.20% | 17.43% | 23.67% | 35.47% | 2.48% | 31.52% |
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 8.18% | 12.74% | 13.38% | 7.82% | -4.48% | 23.74% | -3.99% | 23.28% | -1.79% | 15.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGIIX and VMVFX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2014 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PGIIX and VMVFX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGIIX vs. VMVFX — Risk / Return Rank
PGIIX
VMVFX
PGIIX vs. VMVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Global Growth Fund (PGIIX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PGIIX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.32 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 2.00 | -2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 7.72 | -8.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PGIIX vs. VMVFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGIIX drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, which is greater than VMVFX's maximum drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGIIX and VMVFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGIIX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.09% | -33.09% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.38% | -6.27% | -16.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.38% | -7.96% | -14.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.09% | -13.02% | -24.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.09% | -33.09% | -4.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.51% | -1.10% | -13.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -2.82% | -4.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.37% | 1.62% | +7.75% |
Volatility
PGIIX vs. VMVFX - Volatility Comparison
Polen Global Growth Fund (PGIIX) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) at 2.39%. This indicates that PGIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGIIX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 2.39% | +4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.37% | 5.46% | +7.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.49% | 7.01% | +9.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 10.77% | +8.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.28% | 12.46% | +6.82% |
PGIIX vs. VMVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGIIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVFX's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGIIX vs. VMVFX - Dividend Comparison
PGIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.92%, more than VMVFX's 9.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGIIX Polen Global Growth Fund | 23.92% | 21.62% | 7.45% | 0.00% | 1.15% | 2.48% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.09% |
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 9.22% | 9.98% | 3.77% | 3.05% | 4.96% | 12.73% | 2.02% | 5.12% | 7.27% | 2.30% | 2.71% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGIIX and VMVFX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGIIX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to VMVFX (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGIIX dropped -37.09% vs VMVFX's -33.09%.
VMVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGIIX and VMVFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer