PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGHAX vs. PNSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGHAX vs. PNSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PGHAX) and Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGHAX achieves a -2.28% return, which is significantly lower than PNSAX's 25.36% return.


PGHAX

1D
-1.09%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
-2.28%
6M
-2.44%
1Y
16.08%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*

PNSAX

1D
2.46%
1M
7.03%
YTD
25.36%
6M
21.81%
1Y
38.30%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*
16.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGHAX vs. PNSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PGHAX
Putnam Global Health Care Fund
-2.28%15.58%1.69%9.48%-4.39%19.99%13.35%
PNSAX
Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund
25.36%8.91%22.98%22.87%-28.10%14.38%39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PGHAX and PNSAX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2020

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between PGHAX and PNSAX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGHAX vs. PNSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGHAX
PGHAX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PGHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
PGHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

PNSAX
PNSAX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PNSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PNSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGHAX vs. PNSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PGHAX) and Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGHAXPNSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.28

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

2.74

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.96

9.52

-5.56

PGHAX vs. PNSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGHAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the PNSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGHAX and PNSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGHAX vs. PNSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGHAX drawdown since its inception was -20.52%, smaller than the maximum PNSAX drawdown of -69.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGHAX and PNSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGHAXPNSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.52%

-69.47%

+48.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-14.00%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.52%

-26.25%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.52%

-38.77%

+18.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.35%

0.00%

-6.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-23.51%

+17.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

4.02%

-0.12%

Volatility

PGHAX vs. PNSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PGHAX) is 4.94%, while Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX) has a volatility of 8.82%. This indicates that PGHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGHAXPNSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

8.82%

-3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.39%

19.49%

-9.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.45%

23.77%

-9.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

23.46%

-9.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.43%

23.69%

-9.26%

PGHAX vs. PNSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGHAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than PNSAX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGHAX vs. PNSAX - Dividend Comparison

PGHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than PNSAX's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PGHAX
Putnam Global Health Care Fund
1.90%1.86%4.71%5.33%7.48%11.17%8.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PNSAX
Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund
0.34%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%15.27%4.87%1.93%1.88%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGHAX and PNSAX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PNSAX has higher volatility (8.82%) compared to PGHAX (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGHAX dropped -20.52% vs PNSAX's -69.47%.

PNSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGHAX and PNSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer