PGHAX vs. PEQSX
PGHAX (Putnam Global Health Care Fund) and PEQSX (Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6) are both mutual funds - PGHAX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund managed by Putnam, while PEQSX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Putnam. Over the past 5 years, PGHAX returned 6.28%/yr vs 14.70%/yr for PEQSX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PGHAX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for PEQSX.
Performance
PGHAX vs. PEQSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGHAX achieves a -2.28% return, which is significantly lower than PEQSX's 11.05% return.
PGHAX
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- -2.28%
- 6M
- -2.44%
- 1Y
- 16.08%
- 3Y*
- 7.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- —
PEQSX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 11.05%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 28.13%
- 3Y*
- 20.16%
- 5Y*
- 14.70%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
PGHAX vs. PEQSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGHAX Putnam Global Health Care Fund | -2.28% | 15.58% | 1.69% | 9.48% | -4.39% | 19.99% | 13.35% |
PEQSX Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6 | 11.05% | 20.49% | 19.41% | 15.45% | -2.74% | 27.33% | 20.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGHAX and PEQSX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2020 | 0.63 |
The correlation between PGHAX and PEQSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGHAX vs. PEQSX — Risk / Return Rank
PGHAX
PEQSX
PGHAX vs. PEQSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PGHAX) and Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6 (PEQSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PGHAX | PEQSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.47 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 3.94 | -2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | 15.25 | -11.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PGHAX vs. PEQSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGHAX drawdown since its inception was -20.52%, smaller than the maximum PEQSX drawdown of -36.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGHAX and PEQSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGHAX | PEQSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.52% | -36.04% | +15.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -7.18% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.52% | -15.01% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.52% | -15.18% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.35% | -0.84% | -5.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.64% | -3.21% | -2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 1.85% | +2.05% |
Volatility
PGHAX vs. PEQSX - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PGHAX) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6 (PEQSX) at 3.95%. This indicates that PGHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEQSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGHAX | PEQSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 3.95% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.39% | 8.50% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.45% | 10.94% | +3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 14.55% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 17.02% | -2.59% |
PGHAX vs. PEQSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGHAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than PEQSX's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGHAX vs. PEQSX - Dividend Comparison
PGHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than PEQSX's 5.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEQSX Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6 | 5.07% | 5.69% | 7.14% | 5.26% | 7.40% | 7.40% | 6.30% | 3.66% | 6.08% | 3.56% | 2.66% | 6.31% |
PGHAX Putnam Global Health Care Fund | 1.90% | 1.86% | 4.71% | 5.33% | 7.48% | 11.17% | 8.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGHAX and PEQSX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGHAX has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to PEQSX (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGHAX dropped -20.52% vs PEQSX's -36.04%.
PEQSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGHAX and PEQSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer