PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGHAX vs. FSHCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGHAX vs. FSHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PGHAX) and Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio (FSHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGHAX achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than FSHCX's 11.73% return.


PGHAX

1D
0.69%
1M
2.66%
YTD
0.94%
6M
0.18%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*

FSHCX

1D
0.33%
1M
8.69%
YTD
11.73%
6M
11.67%
1Y
16.78%
3Y*
2.40%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
9.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGHAX vs. FSHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PGHAX
Putnam Global Health Care Fund
0.94%15.58%1.69%9.48%-4.39%19.99%13.35%
FSHCX
Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio
11.73%3.85%-13.21%1.52%0.86%20.22%14.29%

Correlation

The correlation between PGHAX and FSHCX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2020

0.65

The correlation between PGHAX and FSHCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGHAX vs. FSHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGHAX
PGHAX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PGHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PGHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FSHCX
FSHCX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FSHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FSHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGHAX vs. FSHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PGHAX) and Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio (FSHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGHAXFSHCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.16

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

0.92

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.63

2.34

+2.29

PGHAX vs. FSHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGHAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the FSHCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGHAX and FSHCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGHAX vs. FSHCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGHAX drawdown since its inception was -20.52%, smaller than the maximum FSHCX drawdown of -57.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGHAX and FSHCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGHAXFSHCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.52%

-57.81%

+37.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-17.15%

+7.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.52%

-29.52%

+9.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.52%

-29.52%

+9.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.27%

-4.38%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-11.36%

+5.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

6.75%

-2.82%

Volatility

PGHAX vs. FSHCX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PGHAX) and Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio (FSHCX) have volatilities of 5.19% and 5.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGHAXFSHCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

5.07%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

15.48%

-4.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

20.74%

-6.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.46%

19.24%

-4.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.44%

21.49%

-7.05%

PGHAX vs. FSHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGHAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FSHCX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGHAX vs. FSHCX - Dividend Comparison

PGHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than FSHCX's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSHCX
Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio
0.68%0.75%16.63%0.57%5.32%7.09%0.76%0.27%12.92%13.41%4.62%4.06%
PGHAX
Putnam Global Health Care Fund
1.84%1.86%4.71%5.33%7.48%11.17%8.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGHAX and FSHCX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGHAX has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to FSHCX (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGHAX dropped -20.52% vs FSHCX's -57.81%.

PGHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGHAX and FSHCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer