PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGGIX vs. EAIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGGIX vs. EAIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Global Income Trust (PGGIX) and Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGGIX achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than EAIIX's 4.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PGGIX has underperformed EAIIX with an annualized return of 0.35%, while EAIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.80% annualized return.


PGGIX

1D
0.30%
1M
-0.72%
6M
-0.77%
YTD
-0.40%
1Y
1.27%
3Y*
3.15%
5Y*
-1.90%
10Y*
0.35%
ALL TIME*
4.24%

EAIIX

1D
0.51%
1M
0.80%
6M
2.47%
YTD
4.51%
1Y
9.44%
3Y*
6.42%
5Y*
1.52%
10Y*
2.80%
ALL TIME*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PGGIX vs. EAIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGGIX
Putnam Global Income Trust
-0.40%6.27%-0.26%5.27%-15.05%-6.38%5.93%9.35%-2.36%7.24%
EAIIX
Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund
4.51%13.67%-2.81%8.45%-11.29%-5.71%9.33%6.09%-2.67%10.58%

Correlation

The correlation between PGGIX and EAIIX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2007

0.56

The correlation between PGGIX and EAIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.81 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGGIX vs. EAIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PGGIX
PGGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PGGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PGGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

EAIIX
EAIIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
EAIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
EAIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PGGIX vs. EAIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Global Income Trust (PGGIX) and Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGGIXEAIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.70

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

4.28

-3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.59

15.36

-13.76

PGGIX vs. EAIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the EAIIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGGIX and EAIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGGIX vs. EAIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGGIX drawdown since its inception was -26.81%, which is greater than EAIIX's maximum drawdown of -25.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGGIX and EAIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGGIXEAIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.81%

-25.32%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-2.33%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.60%

-8.35%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.33%

-23.13%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.24%

-25.32%

+0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.75%

0.00%

-11.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-5.01%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

0.65%

+0.59%

Volatility

PGGIX vs. EAIIX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Global Income Trust (PGGIX) has a higher volatility of 0.94% compared to Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX) at 0.73%. This indicates that PGGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGGIXEAIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

0.73%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

2.53%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52%

3.13%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.17%

6.54%

-1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.53%

5.48%

-0.95%

PGGIX vs. EAIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGGIX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than EAIIX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGGIX vs. EAIIX - Dividend Comparison

PGGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than EAIIX's 8.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAIIX
Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund
8.77%7.44%4.80%4.42%4.54%5.37%6.13%5.69%4.70%4.43%5.53%5.89%
PGGIX
Putnam Global Income Trust
3.22%3.86%2.79%2.17%2.06%1.72%1.65%2.04%2.42%3.17%3.29%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGGIX and EAIIX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGGIX has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to EAIIX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGGIX dropped -26.81% vs EAIIX's -25.32%.

EAIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGGIX and EAIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer