PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGGAX vs. AIVSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGGAX vs. AIVSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Global Growth Portfolio Class A (PGGAX) and American Funds Investment Company of America Class A (AIVSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGGAX achieves a 13.11% return, which is significantly higher than AIVSX's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, PGGAX has underperformed AIVSX with an annualized return of 12.55%, while AIVSX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.27% annualized return.


PGGAX

1D
0.34%
1M
6.17%
YTD
13.11%
6M
14.32%
1Y
30.51%
3Y*
20.86%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
12.55%

AIVSX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.17%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.87%
1Y
26.68%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGGAX vs. AIVSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGGAX
American Funds Global Growth Portfolio Class A
13.11%23.05%14.85%24.09%-25.77%12.98%27.38%27.93%-8.97%28.63%
AIVSX
American Funds Investment Company of America Class A
10.91%20.47%24.90%28.56%-15.50%25.10%14.47%24.10%-8.21%19.54%

Correlation

The correlation between PGGAX and AIVSX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012

0.93

The correlation between PGGAX and AIVSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGGAX vs. AIVSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGGAX
PGGAX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PGGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
PGGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

AIVSX
AIVSX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AIVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGGAX vs. AIVSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Global Growth Portfolio Class A (PGGAX) and American Funds Investment Company of America Class A (AIVSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGGAXAIVSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.17

2.21

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.01

3.03

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.40

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

2.73

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.17

12.38

-0.21

PGGAX vs. AIVSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGGAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the AIVSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGGAX and AIVSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGGAXAIVSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.21

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.94

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.86

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.70

+0.05

Drawdowns

PGGAX vs. AIVSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGGAX drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, smaller than the maximum AIVSX drawdown of -50.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGGAX and AIVSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGGAXAIVSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.41%

-50.90%

+16.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-10.08%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.99%

-17.40%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

-24.31%

-10.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.41%

-31.09%

-3.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-5.91%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

2.22%

+0.32%

Volatility

PGGAX vs. AIVSX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Global Growth Portfolio Class A (PGGAX) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to American Funds Investment Company of America Class A (AIVSX) at 3.26%. This indicates that PGGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIVSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGGAXAIVSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

3.26%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

9.72%

+1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.27%

12.46%

+1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

16.00%

+1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

16.58%

+0.70%

PGGAX vs. AIVSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGGAX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than AIVSX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGGAX vs. AIVSX - Dividend Comparison

PGGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, less than AIVSX's 9.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVSX
American Funds Investment Company of America Class A
9.58%10.60%9.29%4.96%6.12%6.94%1.65%6.15%9.61%7.08%5.48%8.95%
PGGAX
American Funds Global Growth Portfolio Class A
4.96%5.61%4.31%0.95%7.97%3.34%0.78%4.90%5.69%6.22%3.70%3.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PGGAX and AIVSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PGGAX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to AIVSX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGGAX dropped -34.41% vs AIVSX's -50.90%.

AIVSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGGAX and AIVSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer