PGEIX vs. LZEMX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PGEIX (Polen Global Emerging Markets Growth Fund) and LZEMX (Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past year, PGEIX returned 11.27% vs 54.81% for LZEMX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PGEIX charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for LZEMX.

Performance

PGEIX vs. LZEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen Global Emerging Markets Growth Fund (PGEIX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGEIX achieves a 4.01% return, which is significantly lower than LZEMX's 25.59% return.

PGEIX

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -19.61%
• YTD: 4.01%
• 6M: 6.47%
• 1Y: 11.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LZEMX

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 5.52%
• YTD: 25.59%
• 6M: 27.25%
• 1Y: 54.81%
• 3Y*: 28.77%
• 5Y*: 13.00%
• 10Y*: 11.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGEIX vs. LZEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PGEIX Polen Global Emerging Markets Growth Fund	4.01%	16.07%
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio	25.59%	30.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PGEIX and LZEMX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025	0.67

The correlation between PGEIX and LZEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PGEIX vs. LZEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGEIX

PGEIX Risk / Return Rank: 7
PGEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PGEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PGEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
PGEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PGEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

LZEMX

LZEMX Risk / Return Rank: 95
LZEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
LZEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
LZEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
LZEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LZEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGEIX vs. LZEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Global Emerging Markets Growth Fund (PGEIX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PGEIX	LZEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	4.17	-3.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.68	5.34	-4.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.78	-0.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.46	5.37	-4.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.77	19.75	-17.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PGEIX vs. LZEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGEIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the LZEMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGEIX and LZEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PGEIX	LZEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	4.17	-3.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.41	+0.24

Drawdowns

PGEIX vs. LZEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGEIX drawdown since its inception was -29.87%, smaller than the maximum LZEMX drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGEIX and LZEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PGEIX	LZEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.87%	-60.08%	+30.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.87%	-10.42%	-19.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.27%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.55%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.38%	-1.08%	-21.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.10%	-16.63%	+12.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.83%	—

Volatility

PGEIX vs. LZEMX - Volatility Comparison

Polen Global Emerging Markets Growth Fund (PGEIX) has a higher volatility of 27.05% compared to Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) at 5.40%. This indicates that PGEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PGEIX	LZEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.05%	5.40%	+21.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.22%	11.02%	+21.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.09%	13.43%	+20.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.98%	14.33%	+18.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.98%	16.39%	+16.59%

PGEIX vs. LZEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGEIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LZEMX's 1.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

PGEIX vs. LZEMX - Dividend Comparison

PGEIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LZEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio	1.63%	2.05%	3.11%	3.76%	5.92%	4.89%	2.11%	2.45%	2.10%	1.99%	1.48%	2.14%
PGEIX Polen Global Emerging Markets Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PGEIX and LZEMX in my portfolio?

PGEIX and LZEMX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PGEIX or LZEMX?

PGEIX has higher volatility (27.05%) compared to LZEMX (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGEIX dropped -29.87% vs LZEMX's -60.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LZEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.