PGEIX vs. IEMGX
PGEIX (Polen Global Emerging Markets Growth Fund) and IEMGX (Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past year, PGEIX returned 11.27% vs 77.09% for IEMGX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PGEIX charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for IEMGX.
Performance
PGEIX vs. IEMGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGEIX achieves a 4.01% return, which is significantly lower than IEMGX's 37.69% return.
PGEIX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -19.61%
- YTD
- 4.01%
- 6M
- 6.47%
- 1Y
- 11.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEMGX
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 10.57%
- YTD
- 37.69%
- 6M
- 42.32%
- 1Y
- 77.09%
- 3Y*
- 29.87%
- 5Y*
- 9.53%
- 10Y*
- 11.92%
PGEIX vs. IEMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PGEIX Polen Global Emerging Markets Growth Fund | 4.01% | 16.07% |
IEMGX Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 37.69% | 40.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGEIX and IEMGX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.82 |
The correlation between PGEIX and IEMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGEIX vs. IEMGX — Risk / Return Rank
PGEIX
IEMGX
PGEIX vs. IEMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Global Emerging Markets Growth Fund (PGEIX) and Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGEIX | IEMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.73 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 5.79 | -5.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.77 | 22.01 | -20.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGEIX | IEMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 4.22 | -3.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.43 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
PGEIX vs. IEMGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGEIX drawdown since its inception was -29.87%, smaller than the maximum IEMGX drawdown of -41.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGEIX and IEMGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGEIX | IEMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.87% | -41.87% | +12.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.87% | -15.85% | -14.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.38% | -0.73% | -21.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -15.10% | +11.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.96% | — |
Volatility
PGEIX vs. IEMGX - Volatility Comparison
Polen Global Emerging Markets Growth Fund (PGEIX) has a higher volatility of 27.05% compared to Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IEMGX) at 8.44%. This indicates that PGEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGEIX | IEMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.05% | 8.44% | +18.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.22% | 18.31% | +13.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.09% | 21.78% | +12.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.98% | 18.08% | +14.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.98% | 18.31% | +14.67% |
PGEIX vs. IEMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGEIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMGX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGEIX vs. IEMGX - Dividend Comparison
PGEIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMGX Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 4.36% | 6.01% | 4.66% | 1.99% | 4.22% | 19.49% | 3.91% | 2.69% | 1.01% | 1.39% | 1.17% | 1.53% |
PGEIX Polen Global Emerging Markets Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGEIX and IEMGX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGEIX has higher volatility (27.05%) compared to IEMGX (8.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGEIX dropped -29.87% vs IEMGX's -41.87%.
IEMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.22 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGEIX and IEMGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer