PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGC vs. RBB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PGC vs. RBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) and RBB Bancorp (RBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGC achieves a 70.57% return, which is significantly higher than RBB's 33.37% return.


PGC

1D
-1.97%
1M
12.43%
6M
70.94%
YTD
70.57%
1Y
56.99%
3Y*
21.05%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
10.34%

RBB

1D
-2.83%
1M
15.35%
6M
34.41%
YTD
33.37%
1Y
51.37%
3Y*
36.45%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGC vs. RBB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation
70.57%-12.47%8.27%-19.31%5.74%56.52%-25.58%23.59%-27.64%6.78%
RBB
RBB Bancorp
33.37%4.38%11.03%-4.42%-18.49%74.37%-25.70%22.98%-34.99%17.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PGC and RBB is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

0.62

The correlation between PGC and RBB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PGC:

$839.50M

RBB:

$459.47M

EPS

PGC:

$2.47

RBB:

$2.37

PE Ratio

PGC:

19.17

RBB:

11.47

PS Ratio

PGC:

2.00

RBB:

1.96

PB Ratio

PGC:

1.20

RBB:

0.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

PGC:

$419.70M

RBB:

$240.17M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PGC:

$197.39M

RBB:

$97.09M

EBITDA (TTM)

PGC:

$51.65M

RBB:

$43.38M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RBB Bancorp

Often compared with PGC:
PGC vs. GS

Return for Risk

PGC vs. RBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGC
PGC Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

RBB
RBB Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
RBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBB Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
RBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBB Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGC vs. RBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) and RBB Bancorp (RBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGCRBBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

2.91

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.90

10.20

-2.31

PGC vs. RBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGC Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the RBB Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGC and RBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGC vs. RBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGC drawdown since its inception was -70.43%, roughly equal to the maximum RBB drawdown of -69.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGC and RBB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGCRBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.43%

-69.22%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.64%

-18.18%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.23%

-39.17%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.02%

-66.85%

+16.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-2.83%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.76%

-31.10%

+4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.71%

5.17%

+2.54%

Volatility

PGC vs. RBB - Volatility Comparison

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) has a higher volatility of 8.94% compared to RBB Bancorp (RBB) at 7.39%. This indicates that PGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGCRBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.94%

7.39%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.22%

17.66%

+3.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.53%

27.60%

+4.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.10%

34.06%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.09%

35.73%

+1.36%

Dividends

PGC vs. RBB - Dividend Comparison

PGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than RBB's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation
0.42%0.72%0.62%0.67%0.54%0.56%0.88%0.65%0.79%0.57%0.65%0.97%
RBB
RBB Bancorp
2.36%3.10%3.12%3.36%2.69%1.95%2.15%1.89%1.99%0.29%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PGC vs. RBB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation and RBB Bancorp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
82.49M
56.80M
(PGC) Total Revenue
(RBB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PGC vs. RBB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation and RBB Bancorp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober202600
Portfolio components
PGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 82.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RBB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, RBB Bancorp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 56.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 82.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

RBB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, RBB Bancorp reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 56.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

PGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation reported a net income of 14.15M and revenue of 82.49M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.

RBB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, RBB Bancorp reported a net income of 11.30M and revenue of 56.80M, resulting in a net margin of 19.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PGC and RBB have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGC has higher volatility (8.94%) compared to RBB (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGC dropped -70.43% vs RBB's -69.22%.

RBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGC and RBB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer