PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGAIX vs. GBFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGAIX vs. GBFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Global Core Asset Allocation Fund (PGAIX) and GMO Benchmark-Free Fund (GBFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PGAIX having a 12.24% return and GBFFX slightly lower at 12.16%. Over the past 10 years, PGAIX has outperformed GBFFX with an annualized return of 9.23%, while GBFFX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.18% annualized return.


PGAIX

1D
-0.31%
1M
4.13%
YTD
12.24%
6M
14.17%
1Y
28.05%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
9.23%

GBFFX

1D
0.04%
1M
2.81%
YTD
12.16%
6M
14.23%
1Y
29.26%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
7.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGAIX vs. GBFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGAIX
PIMCO Global Core Asset Allocation Fund
12.24%20.68%14.76%12.48%-17.38%11.35%14.57%15.29%-5.15%14.78%
GBFFX
GMO Benchmark-Free Fund
12.16%24.07%0.40%15.24%-3.36%4.38%-3.35%13.79%-7.12%17.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PGAIX and GBFFX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2015

0.76

The correlation between PGAIX and GBFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGAIX vs. GBFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGAIX
PGAIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PGAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PGAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

GBFFX
GBFFX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GBFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GBFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGAIX vs. GBFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Global Core Asset Allocation Fund (PGAIX) and GMO Benchmark-Free Fund (GBFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGAIXGBFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.86

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

5.24

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.94

20.15

-3.22

PGAIX vs. GBFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGAIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.58, which is comparable to the GBFFX Sharpe Ratio of 4.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGAIX and GBFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGAIXGBFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58

4.25

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

1.00

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.79

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.70

+0.02

Drawdowns

PGAIX vs. GBFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGAIX drawdown since its inception was -26.75%, roughly equal to the maximum GBFFX drawdown of -26.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGAIX and GBFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGAIXGBFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.75%

-26.62%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-5.67%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.71%

-10.18%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.49%

-15.91%

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.75%

-26.62%

-0.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

0.00%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.67%

-4.37%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.47%

+0.22%

Volatility

PGAIX vs. GBFFX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Global Core Asset Allocation Fund (PGAIX) has a higher volatility of 2.71% compared to GMO Benchmark-Free Fund (GBFFX) at 2.28%. This indicates that PGAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGAIXGBFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

2.28%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.74%

5.38%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.03%

6.99%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.78%

8.07%

+1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.26%

9.08%

+1.18%

PGAIX vs. GBFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGAIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GBFFX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGAIX vs. GBFFX - Dividend Comparison

PGAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than GBFFX's 4.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBFFX
GMO Benchmark-Free Fund
4.56%5.11%1.81%5.72%5.48%4.60%3.32%4.00%3.92%2.90%2.72%6.67%
PGAIX
PIMCO Global Core Asset Allocation Fund
2.27%1.78%4.27%1.54%1.07%1.10%10.94%2.49%3.12%1.67%1.66%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGAIX and GBFFX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGAIX has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to GBFFX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGAIX dropped -26.75% vs GBFFX's -26.62%.

GBFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.25 vs 3.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGAIX and GBFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer