GBFFX vs. CIBFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GBFFX (GMO Benchmark-Free Fund) and CIBFX (American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-1) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, GBFFX returned 7.06%/yr vs 7.83%/yr for CIBFX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GBFFX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for CIBFX.

Performance

GBFFX vs. CIBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Benchmark-Free Fund (GBFFX) and American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-1 (CIBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBFFX achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly higher than CIBFX's 7.39% return. Over the past 10 years, GBFFX has underperformed CIBFX with an annualized return of 7.06%, while CIBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.83% annualized return.

GBFFX

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 10.56%
• 6M: 11.21%
• 1Y: 27.16%
• 3Y*: 14.29%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: 7.06%

CIBFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 6M: 7.68%
• 1Y: 17.69%
• 3Y*: 14.25%
• 5Y*: 8.75%
• 10Y*: 7.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBFFX vs. CIBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GBFFX GMO Benchmark-Free Fund	10.56%	24.07%	0.40%	15.24%	-3.36%	4.38%	-3.35%	13.79%	-7.12%	17.06%
CIBFX American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-1	7.39%	20.29%	10.16%	8.90%	-7.21%	14.95%	3.14%	17.16%	-7.10%	13.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GBFFX and CIBFX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015	0.79

The correlation between GBFFX and CIBFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GBFFX vs. CIBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBFFX

GBFFX Risk / Return Rank: 95
GBFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
GBFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
GBFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
GBFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
GBFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

CIBFX

CIBFX Risk / Return Rank: 60
CIBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
CIBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CIBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
CIBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
CIBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBFFX vs. CIBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Benchmark-Free Fund (GBFFX) and American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-1 (CIBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GBFFX	CIBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.73	2.13	+1.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.34	3.03	+2.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.75	1.40	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.75	2.71	+2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.99	10.72	+7.27

GBFFX vs. CIBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBFFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.73, which is higher than the CIBFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBFFX and CIBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GBFFX vs. CIBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBFFX drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, smaller than the maximum CIBFX drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBFFX and CIBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GBFFX	CIBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.62%	-43.26%	+16.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.67%	-6.49%	+0.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.18%	-8.89%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.16%	-17.68%	+2.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.62%	-25.28%	-1.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	-0.73%	-0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.36%	-4.71%	+0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.49%	1.64%	-0.15%

Volatility

GBFFX vs. CIBFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Benchmark-Free Fund (GBFFX) is 2.37%, while American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-1 (CIBFX) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that GBFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GBFFX	CIBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.37%	2.55%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.68%	6.63%	-0.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.22%	8.24%	-1.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.10%	10.01%	-1.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.09%	10.89%	-1.80%

GBFFX vs. CIBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBFFX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBFX's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

GBFFX vs. CIBFX - Dividend Comparison

GBFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than CIBFX's 7.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBFX American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-1	7.24%	7.65%	5.69%	3.41%	3.37%	3.08%	3.34%	4.04%	3.72%	4.37%	3.46%	3.56%
GBFFX GMO Benchmark-Free Fund	4.63%	5.11%	1.81%	5.72%	5.48%	4.60%	3.32%	4.00%	3.92%	2.90%	2.72%	6.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GBFFX and CIBFX in my portfolio?

GBFFX and CIBFX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GBFFX or CIBFX?

CIBFX has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to GBFFX (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBFFX dropped -26.62% vs CIBFX's -43.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GBFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.