PFXF vs. BINC
PFXF (VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF) and BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFXF is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities ex Financials Index, while BINC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. PFXF is passively managed, while BINC is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PFXF returned 10.30%/yr vs 7.02%/yr for BINC. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFXF charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BINC.
Performance
PFXF vs. BINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFXF achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's 0.90% return.
PFXF
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 18.28%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
BINC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 5.80%
- 3Y*
- 7.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFXF vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PFXF VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF | 8.54% | 9.64% | 8.42% | 6.85% |
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 0.90% | 7.57% | 5.76% | 7.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFXF and BINC is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023 | 0.57 |
The correlation between PFXF and BINC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
PFXF vs. BINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFXF
BINC
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
PFXF
BINC
Utilities
PFXF
BINC
-
Technology
PFXF
BINC
-
Communication Services
PFXF
BINC
Financial Services
PFXF
BINC
Healthcare
PFXF
BINC
Consumer Defensive
PFXF
BINC
-
Consumer Cyclical
PFXF
BINC
-
Industrials
PFXF
BINC
Energy
PFXF
BINC
Basic Materials
PFXF
-
BINC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFXF vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank
PFXF
BINC
PFXF vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFXF | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.51 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 2.17 | +0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.08 | 8.53 | +2.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFXF | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 2.56 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 2.36 | -1.88 |
Drawdowns
PFXF vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFXF drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFXF and BINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFXF | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.49% | -2.69% | -32.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.83% | -2.69% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.90% | -2.69% | -9.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -0.49% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -0.36% | -3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 0.68% | +0.97% |
Volatility
PFXF vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 0.75%. This indicates that PFXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFXF | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 0.75% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.89% | 1.84% | +5.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.94% | 2.28% | +6.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.91% | 3.00% | +7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 3.00% | +10.21% |
PFXF vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFXF has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFXF vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison
PFXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than BINC's 5.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 5.86% | 5.86% | 6.14% | 3.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFXF VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF | 6.08% | 6.72% | 7.82% | 7.88% | 6.74% | 4.66% | 5.19% | 5.35% | 6.56% | 5.93% | 5.81% | 5.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFXF and BINC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFXF has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to BINC (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFXF dropped -35.49% vs BINC's -2.69%.
On 3-year performance, PFXF leads with 10.30% vs 7.02% for BINC. On fees, BINC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BINC has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PFXF has performed better with a 10.30% return vs 7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BINC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for PFXF.
PFXF has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 5.86% for BINC.
PFXF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while BINC is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for PFXF and 0.40% for BINC.
BINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFXF and BINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer