PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFTEX vs. QSTFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFTEX vs. QSTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX) and Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFTEX achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than QSTFX's 20.10% return.


PFTEX

1D
1.96%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
8.00%
6M
8.34%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*

QSTFX

1D
0.32%
1M
1.66%
YTD
20.10%
6M
19.73%
1Y
50.41%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*
18.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFTEX vs. QSTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFTEX
PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund
8.00%13.11%13.02%12.53%-13.13%11.68%3.04%9.96%-5.02%0.20%
QSTFX
Quantified STF Fund
20.10%-2.48%29.94%61.87%-46.15%28.79%78.20%16.43%-6.86%-1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between PFTEX and QSTFX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2017

0.67

The correlation between PFTEX and QSTFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (5 years) to 0.73 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFTEX vs. QSTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFTEX
PFTEX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PFTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PFTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

QSTFX
QSTFX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
QSTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
QSTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFTEX vs. QSTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX) and Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFTEXQSTFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.63

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

6.72

+3.55

PFTEX vs. QSTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFTEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the QSTFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFTEX and QSTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFTEX vs. QSTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFTEX drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum QSTFX drawdown of -49.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFTEX and QSTFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFTEXQSTFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-49.03%

+29.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-17.87%

+8.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-32.22%

+16.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.99%

-49.03%

+31.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

0.00%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-15.44%

+10.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

6.97%

-4.98%

Volatility

PFTEX vs. QSTFX - Volatility Comparison

PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX) at 0.71%. This indicates that PFTEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QSTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFTEXQSTFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

0.71%

+3.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

18.70%

-9.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

25.16%

-13.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

27.04%

-10.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.56%

27.88%

-13.32%

PFTEX vs. QSTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFTEX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than QSTFX's 1.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFTEX vs. QSTFX - Dividend Comparison

PFTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.75%, less than QSTFX's 8.87% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PFTEX
PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund
8.75%9.45%3.38%2.23%18.46%2.00%1.00%0.15%0.18%0.13%0.00%
QSTFX
Quantified STF Fund
8.87%10.65%5.12%1.03%0.00%21.93%20.82%0.52%2.57%39.11%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFTEX and QSTFX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFTEX has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to QSTFX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFTEX dropped -19.72% vs QSTFX's -49.03%.

QSTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFTEX and QSTFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer