PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFTEX vs. PDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFTEX vs. PDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFTEX achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly lower than PDX's 18.39% return.


PFTEX

1D
0.26%
1M
4.57%
YTD
9.89%
6M
10.33%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
14.72%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*

PDX

1D
-0.69%
1M
2.06%
YTD
18.39%
6M
20.19%
1Y
12.82%
3Y*
27.81%
5Y*
22.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFTEX vs. PDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PFTEX
PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund
9.89%13.11%13.02%12.53%-13.13%11.68%3.04%8.70%
PDX
PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund
18.39%-10.59%36.99%44.51%23.02%68.79%-44.20%-10.78%

Correlation

The correlation between PFTEX and PDX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2019

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between PFTEX and PDX has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFTEX vs. PDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFTEX
PFTEX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PFTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
PFTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

PDX
PDX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
PDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFTEX vs. PDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFTEXPDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.17

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

0.82

+1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

1.88

+10.32

PFTEX vs. PDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFTEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the PDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFTEX and PDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFTEXPDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

0.90

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.89

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.31

+0.12

Drawdowns

PFTEX vs. PDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFTEX drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum PDX drawdown of -80.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFTEX and PDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFTEXPDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-80.63%

+60.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-15.65%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-37.24%

+21.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.99%

-37.24%

+19.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-14.00%

+14.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-18.84%

+13.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

6.83%

-4.87%

Volatility

PFTEX vs. PDX - Volatility Comparison

PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) have volatilities of 3.05% and 3.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFTEXPDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

3.19%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.53%

10.24%

-1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.00%

14.70%

-3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.98%

25.64%

-9.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.54%

36.48%

-21.94%

PFTEX vs. PDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFTEX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PDX's 2.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFTEX vs. PDX - Dividend Comparison

PFTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%, less than PDX's 21.24% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDX
PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund
21.24%24.34%6.31%4.30%5.89%5.28%14.11%9.58%0.00%0.00%
PFTEX
PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund
8.60%9.45%3.38%2.23%18.46%2.00%1.00%0.15%0.18%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFTEX and PDX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDX has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to PFTEX (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFTEX dropped -19.72% vs PDX's -80.63%.

PFTEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFTEX and PDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer