PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFSZX vs. RYFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFSZX vs. RYFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Financial Services Fund (PFSZX) and Rydex Financial Services Fund (RYFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSZX achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than RYFIX's 0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, PFSZX has outperformed RYFIX with an annualized return of 13.64%, while RYFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.29% annualized return.


PFSZX

1D
-0.69%
1M
3.47%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
-1.61%
1Y
9.55%
3Y*
23.05%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
13.64%

RYFIX

1D
-0.47%
1M
2.15%
YTD
0.06%
6M
-1.15%
1Y
7.11%
3Y*
16.12%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*
10.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFSZX vs. RYFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFSZX
PGIM Jennison Financial Services Fund
-0.04%12.06%42.87%20.73%-17.36%26.81%10.81%33.73%-13.56%23.53%
RYFIX
Rydex Financial Services Fund
0.06%11.21%22.86%14.54%-18.03%35.83%0.27%28.32%-12.05%15.74%

Correlation

The correlation between PFSZX and RYFIX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1999

0.91

The correlation between PFSZX and RYFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFSZX vs. RYFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFSZX
PFSZX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PFSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

RYFIX
RYFIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
RYFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
RYFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFSZX vs. RYFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Financial Services Fund (PFSZX) and Rydex Financial Services Fund (RYFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFSZXRYFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.10

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

0.55

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.60

1.60

0.00

PFSZX vs. RYFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is comparable to the RYFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSZX and RYFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFSZX vs. RYFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSZX drawdown since its inception was -55.10%, smaller than the maximum RYFIX drawdown of -77.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSZX and RYFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFSZXRYFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.10%

-77.63%

+22.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.70%

-13.52%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-18.14%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.42%

-27.08%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.49%

-44.01%

-0.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-2.95%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.66%

-18.37%

+8.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.19%

4.60%

+1.59%

Volatility

PFSZX vs. RYFIX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Financial Services Fund (PFSZX) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to Rydex Financial Services Fund (RYFIX) at 4.35%. This indicates that PFSZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFSZXRYFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

4.35%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

10.89%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

14.21%

+2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.52%

18.53%

+2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.07%

21.00%

+2.07%

PFSZX vs. RYFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFSZX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than RYFIX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFSZX vs. RYFIX - Dividend Comparison

PFSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.71%, more than RYFIX's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFSZX
PGIM Jennison Financial Services Fund
9.71%9.71%14.10%6.25%2.95%10.03%0.60%0.80%1.13%1.40%1.91%2.20%
RYFIX
Rydex Financial Services Fund
1.21%1.21%0.76%0.00%25.45%0.83%0.00%0.41%5.14%0.51%0.71%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PFSZX and RYFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PFSZX has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to RYFIX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSZX dropped -55.10% vs RYFIX's -77.63%.

PFSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFSZX and RYFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer