PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFSVX vs. DHSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFSVX vs. DHSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iMGP SBH Focused Small Value Fund (PFSVX) and Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSVX achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly lower than DHSCX's 25.43% return.


PFSVX

1D
0.19%
1M
1.82%
6M
2.29%
YTD
11.70%
1Y
16.37%
3Y*
12.13%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*

DHSCX

1D
0.36%
1M
3.47%
6M
16.23%
YTD
25.43%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
13.56%
10Y*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFSVX vs. DHSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PFSVX
iMGP SBH Focused Small Value Fund
11.70%-0.02%14.04%24.90%-13.39%19.74%27.10%
DHSCX
Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund
25.43%11.48%12.75%23.99%-15.11%32.30%28.35%

Correlation

The correlation between PFSVX and DHSCX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020

0.91

The correlation between PFSVX and DHSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFSVX vs. DHSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFSVX
PFSVX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PFSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

DHSCX
DHSCX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DHSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DHSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFSVX vs. DHSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP SBH Focused Small Value Fund (PFSVX) and Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFSVXDHSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.34

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

3.48

-2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.89

11.16

-7.27

PFSVX vs. DHSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the DHSCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSVX and DHSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFSVX vs. DHSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSVX drawdown since its inception was -30.18%, smaller than the maximum DHSCX drawdown of -53.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSVX and DHSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFSVXDHSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.18%

-53.15%

+22.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.16%

-11.02%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.18%

-28.41%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.18%

-28.41%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.33%

-2.97%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.99%

-8.28%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

3.43%

+1.05%

Volatility

PFSVX vs. DHSCX - Volatility Comparison

iMGP SBH Focused Small Value Fund (PFSVX) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX) at 5.12%. This indicates that PFSVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFSVXDHSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.88%

5.12%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.72%

13.91%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.26%

19.70%

+0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.57%

21.47%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.53%

22.20%

+0.33%

PFSVX vs. DHSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFSVX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DHSCX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFSVX vs. DHSCX - Dividend Comparison

PFSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than DHSCX's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHSCX
Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund
4.63%5.80%16.10%30.73%18.17%17.43%0.32%6.94%10.29%6.68%2.50%1.63%
PFSVX
iMGP SBH Focused Small Value Fund
3.81%4.26%17.23%7.81%0.00%2.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFSVX and DHSCX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFSVX has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to DHSCX (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSVX dropped -30.18% vs DHSCX's -53.15%.

DHSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFSVX and DHSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer