PFSLX vs. FMCDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A (FMCDX).
PFSLX is managed by Paradigm Funds. It was launched on Jan 3, 2005. FMCDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Performance
PFSLX vs. FMCDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PFSLX vs. FMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFSLX Paradigm Select Fund | 11.83% | 13.27% | 16.73% | 26.94% | -26.44% | 31.16% | 26.05% | 38.32% | -9.93% | 16.13% |
FMCDX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A | 4.11% | 10.17% | 8.89% | 16.86% | -14.11% | 22.92% | 12.77% | 29.26% | -7.82% | 19.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFSLX achieves a 11.83% return, which is significantly higher than FMCDX's 4.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PFSLX has outperformed FMCDX with an annualized return of 14.28%, while FMCDX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.56% annualized return.
PFSLX
- 1D
- 4.93%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- 11.83%
- 6M
- 22.96%
- 1Y
- 45.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.58%
- 10Y*
- 14.28%
FMCDX
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- 4.11%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 11.56%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PFSLX vs. FMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFSLX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FMCDX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PFSLX vs. FMCDX — Risk / Return Rank
PFSLX
FMCDX
PFSLX vs. FMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A (FMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFSLX | FMCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 0.95 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | 1.45 | +0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.20 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 1.43 | +1.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | 6.29 | +6.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFSLX | FMCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 0.95 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.31 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | 0.51 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.48 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between PFSLX and FMCDX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PFSLX vs. FMCDX - Dividend Comparison
PFSLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than FMCDX's 8.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFSLX Paradigm Select Fund | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.31% | 0.01% | 0.17% | 0.11% | 0.58% | 2.93% | 3.89% | 0.74% | 9.40% |
FMCDX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A | 8.24% | 8.58% | 0.00% | 0.61% | 10.14% | 13.43% | 2.25% | 4.16% | 21.85% | 4.30% | 1.03% | 9.17% |
Drawdowns
PFSLX vs. FMCDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFSLX drawdown since its inception was -93.50%, which is greater than FMCDX's maximum drawdown of -65.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSLX and FMCDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFSLX | FMCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.50% | -65.00% | -28.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.70% | -14.31% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.50% | -25.19% | -68.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.50% | -43.40% | -50.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.23% | -5.88% | -83.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.35% | -10.69% | -2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 3.25% | +0.30% |
Volatility
PFSLX vs. FMCDX - Volatility Comparison
Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX) has a higher volatility of 11.60% compared to Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A (FMCDX) at 7.17%. This indicates that PFSLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PFSLX | FMCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.60% | 7.17% | +4.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.65% | 12.42% | +6.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.15% | 21.39% | +6.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 475.26% | 19.96% | +455.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 336.39% | 20.95% | +315.44% |