PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFS vs. SWPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFS vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Provident Financial Services, Inc. (PFS) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PFS having a 11.43% return and SWPPX slightly higher at 11.69%. Over the past 10 years, PFS has underperformed SWPPX with an annualized return of 5.45%, while SWPPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.


PFS

1D
-3.19%
1M
-2.12%
YTD
11.43%
6M
10.26%
1Y
34.61%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*
5.45%

SWPPX

1D
0.15%
1M
5.83%
YTD
11.69%
6M
11.71%
1Y
28.97%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFS vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFS
Provident Financial Services, Inc.
11.43%10.22%10.72%-10.79%-8.03%40.47%-22.53%6.72%-7.61%-1.21%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
11.69%17.87%24.96%26.26%-18.14%28.67%18.38%31.46%-4.47%21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PFS and SWPPX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2003

0.54

The correlation between PFS and SWPPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFS vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFS
PFS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFS vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Provident Financial Services, Inc. (PFS) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFSSWPPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

2.52

-1.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.95

3.41

-1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.46

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

3.36

-0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.93

15.67

-9.74

PFS vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFS Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFS and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFSSWPPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

2.52

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.85

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.86

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.51

-0.36

Drawdowns

PFS vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFS drawdown since its inception was -64.09%, which is greater than SWPPX's maximum drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFS and SWPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFSSWPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.09%

-55.06%

-9.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.49%

-8.89%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.31%

-18.74%

-12.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.65%

-24.51%

-19.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.09%

-33.80%

-30.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.49%

0.00%

-7.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.43%

-9.95%

-6.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.85%

1.90%

+3.95%

Volatility

PFS vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

Provident Financial Services, Inc. (PFS) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) at 2.83%. This indicates that PFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFSSWPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.24%

2.83%

+3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.97%

8.98%

+8.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.93%

11.87%

+15.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.87%

16.93%

+13.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.68%

18.23%

+15.45%

Dividends

PFS vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

PFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than SWPPX's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFS
Provident Financial Services, Inc.
4.46%4.86%5.09%5.32%4.49%3.84%5.12%4.54%3.40%3.45%2.51%3.23%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
0.99%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFS and SWPPX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFS has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to SWPPX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFS dropped -64.09% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFS and SWPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer