PFS vs. DIVO
PFS (Provident Financial Services, Inc.) is a stock, while DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. Over the past 5 years, PFS returned 1.76%/yr vs 10.61%/yr for DIVO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PFS vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFS achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly higher than DIVO's 5.53% return.
PFS
- 1D
- -3.19%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 11.43%
- 6M
- 10.26%
- 1Y
- 34.61%
- 3Y*
- 13.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- 5.45%
DIVO
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 5.53%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- 1Y
- 18.37%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.61%
- 10Y*
- —
PFS vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFS Provident Financial Services, Inc. | 11.43% | 10.22% | 10.72% | -10.79% | -8.03% | 40.47% | -22.53% | 6.72% | -7.61% | -1.21% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 5.53% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 22.87% | 12.40% | 24.90% | -3.18% | 21.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFS and DIVO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016 | 0.45 |
The correlation between PFS and DIVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFS vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank
PFS
DIVO
PFS vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Provident Financial Services, Inc. (PFS) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFS | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 2.06 | -0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.95 | 3.05 | -1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 3.10 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.93 | 11.21 | -5.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFS | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 2.06 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.89 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.85 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
PFS vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFS drawdown since its inception was -64.09%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFS and DIVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFS | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.09% | -30.04% | -34.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.49% | -5.95% | -8.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.31% | -12.12% | -19.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.65% | -13.72% | -29.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.49% | -0.82% | -6.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.43% | -2.61% | -13.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.85% | 1.64% | +4.21% |
Volatility
PFS vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison
Provident Financial Services, Inc. (PFS) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 2.01%. This indicates that PFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFS | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.24% | 2.01% | +4.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.97% | 6.88% | +11.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.93% | 8.97% | +17.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.87% | 11.94% | +18.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.68% | 14.84% | +18.84% |
Dividends
PFS vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison
PFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than DIVO's 6.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.42% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFS Provident Financial Services, Inc. | 4.46% | 4.86% | 5.09% | 5.32% | 4.49% | 3.84% | 5.12% | 4.54% | 3.40% | 3.45% | 2.51% | 3.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFS and DIVO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFS has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to DIVO (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFS dropped -64.09% vs DIVO's -30.04%.
DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFS and DIVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer