PFOE vs. GRW

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

PFOE (Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFOE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

PFOE vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF (PFOE) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PFOE

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 1.00%
• 6M: -11.50%
• YTD: -6.97%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 2.02%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFOE vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PFOE Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF	-0.64%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	3.44%

Correlation

The correlation between PFOE and GRW is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.65

Return for Risk

PFOE vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF (PFOE) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

PFOE vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFOE drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -3.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFOE and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFOE	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.19%	-3.83%	-14.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.89%	-1.41%	-10.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.69%	-1.01%	-8.68%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PFOE	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.75%	16.56%	+2.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.75%	16.56%	+2.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.75%	16.56%	+2.19%

PFOE vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFOE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFOE vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

PFOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%
PFOE Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFOE and GRW in my portfolio?

PFOE and GRW have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PFOE or GRW?

On fees, PFOE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFOE or GRW?

PFOE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFOE or GRW?

PFOE has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between PFOE and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: Pathfinder and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFOE and 0.75% for GRW.