PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFOAX vs. PRSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFOAX vs. PRSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PFOAX) and T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFOAX achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than PRSNX's 1.82% return. Over the past 10 years, PFOAX has underperformed PRSNX with an annualized return of 2.47%, while PRSNX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.90% annualized return.


PFOAX

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.72%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
-0.25%
1Y
2.27%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*
2.47%

PRSNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.69%
YTD
1.82%
6M
3.04%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
8.29%
5Y*
2.12%
10Y*
3.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFOAX vs. PRSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFOAX
PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A
-0.35%3.91%5.29%9.07%-10.60%-2.06%5.75%7.21%2.24%3.11%
PRSNX
T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund
1.82%9.31%5.60%12.77%-16.27%0.40%8.16%11.94%0.45%6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PFOAX and PRSNX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2008

0.50

The correlation between PFOAX and PRSNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFOAX vs. PRSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFOAX
PFOAX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PFOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PFOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

PRSNX
PRSNX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PRSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFOAX vs. PRSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PFOAX) and T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFOAXPRSNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

2.77

-2.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.96

5.02

-4.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.67

-0.54

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

3.66

-2.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.23

16.41

-14.18

PFOAX vs. PRSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFOAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the PRSNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFOAX and PRSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFOAXPRSNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

2.77

-2.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.50

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.95

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

1.43

-0.50

Drawdowns

PFOAX vs. PRSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFOAX drawdown since its inception was -14.73%, smaller than the maximum PRSNX drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFOAX and PRSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFOAXPRSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.73%

-19.70%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.99%

-2.18%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.99%

-2.87%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.03%

-19.70%

+5.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.38%

-19.70%

+5.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-0.10%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-2.36%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

0.48%

+0.83%

Volatility

PFOAX vs. PRSNX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PFOAX) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX) at 0.83%. This indicates that PFOAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFOAXPRSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

0.83%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.34%

2.31%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.74%

2.88%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.58%

4.30%

-0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.13%

4.13%

-1.00%

PFOAX vs. PRSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFOAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than PRSNX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFOAX vs. PRSNX - Dividend Comparison

PFOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, less than PRSNX's 6.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFOAX
PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A
3.71%3.83%4.52%2.62%3.33%1.14%2.07%6.45%2.51%1.06%0.98%8.57%
PRSNX
T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund
6.63%7.87%6.36%5.08%3.30%3.95%3.68%6.33%4.89%3.59%3.44%3.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFOAX and PRSNX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFOAX has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to PRSNX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFOAX dropped -14.73% vs PRSNX's -19.70%.

PRSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFOAX and PRSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer