PFN vs. PSLDX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX).
PFN is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Oct 27, 2004. PSLDX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Aug 31, 2007.
Performance
PFN vs. PSLDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PFN vs. PSLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFN PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II | -5.26% | 13.07% | 15.72% | 15.43% | -17.65% | 5.14% | 3.97% | 21.84% | 0.94% | 20.58% |
PSLDX PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I | -6.30% | 12.26% | 17.15% | 27.92% | -43.18% | 25.85% | 37.80% | 60.43% | -9.31% | 33.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFN achieves a -5.26% return, which is significantly higher than PSLDX's -6.30% return. Over the past 10 years, PFN has underperformed PSLDX with an annualized return of 8.38%, while PSLDX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.
PFN
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -3.99%
- YTD
- -5.26%
- 6M
- -3.66%
- 1Y
- 2.57%
- 3Y*
- 11.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- 8.38%
PSLDX
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- -8.98%
- YTD
- -6.30%
- 6M
- -11.47%
- 1Y
- 5.69%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PFN vs. PSLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFN has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PSLDX's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PFN vs. PSLDX — Risk / Return Rank
PFN
PSLDX
PFN vs. PSLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFN | PSLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.19 | 0.28 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.33 | 0.55 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.08 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 0.37 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.01 | 1.11 | -0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFN | PSLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | 0.28 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.12 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.60 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.61 | -0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between PFN and PSLDX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PFN vs. PSLDX - Dividend Comparison
PFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.49%, more than PSLDX's 3.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFN PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II | 12.49% | 11.49% | 11.57% | 11.92% | 12.19% | 9.71% | 9.67% | 9.07% | 10.81% | 9.20% | 10.12% | 11.74% |
PSLDX PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I | 3.30% | 5.60% | 16.73% | 3.67% | 2.66% | 38.80% | 12.89% | 18.91% | 15.58% | 24.52% | 11.55% | 12.08% |
Drawdowns
PFN vs. PSLDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFN drawdown since its inception was -80.08%, which is greater than PSLDX's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFN and PSLDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFN | PSLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.08% | -55.25% | -24.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.77% | -19.25% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.45% | -49.32% | +15.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.70% | -49.32% | +3.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.29% | -15.88% | +9.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.89% | -10.70% | -1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 6.38% | -3.57% |
Volatility
PFN vs. PSLDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) is 6.56%, while PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX) has a volatility of 8.39%. This indicates that PFN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PFN | PSLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 8.39% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.40% | 14.38% | -5.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.35% | 24.15% | -10.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 22.90% | -8.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 21.33% | -3.17% |