PFMN.TO vs. ZLB.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PFMN.TO (PICTON Market Neutral Equity Alternative Fund) and ZLB.TO (BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFMN.TO is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Picton Mahoney, while ZLB.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by BMO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFMN.TO returned 6.60%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for ZLB.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFMN.TO charges 4.27%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ZLB.TO.

Performance

PFMN.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in PICTON Market Neutral Equity Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFMN.TO achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than ZLB.TO's 3.14% return.

PFMN.TO

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 1.87%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 2.01%
• 1Y: 4.37%
• 3Y*: 7.28%
• 5Y*: 6.60%
• 10Y*: —

ZLB.TO

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 3.14%
• 6M: 4.82%
• 1Y: 14.81%
• 3Y*: 15.17%
• 5Y*: 11.61%
• 10Y*: 10.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFMN.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PFMN.TO PICTON Market Neutral Equity Alternative Fund	1.49%	4.86%	15.06%	3.13%	5.43%	6.10%	16.70%	0.99%
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF	3.14%	25.29%	15.31%	9.41%	-0.35%	22.93%	1.51%	3.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PFMN.TO and ZLB.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019	0.21

PFMN.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PFMN.TO	ZLB.TO
Financial Services	23.0%	23.7%
Technology	16.5%	2.0%
Basic Materials	11.8%	6.6%
Industrials	11.0%	9.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	8.6%
Energy	8.1%	-
Healthcare	5.4%	-
Communication Services	5.0%	9.2%
Utilities	3.9%	17.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	18.2%
Real Estate	3.3%	4.3%

Return for Risk

PFMN.TO vs. ZLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFMN.TO

PFMN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 26
PFMN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
PFMN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
PFMN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 24
PFMN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
PFMN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 29

ZLB.TO

ZLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 54
ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ZLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
ZLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ZLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
ZLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFMN.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PICTON Market Neutral Equity Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PFMN.TO	ZLB.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	1.80	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	2.69	-1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.32	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	2.77	-1.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.31	10.29	-5.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PFMN.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFMN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFMN.TO and ZLB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PFMN.TO	ZLB.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	1.80	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	1.24	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	1.14	-0.35

Drawdowns

PFMN.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFMN.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.04%, smaller than the maximum ZLB.TO drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFMN.TO and ZLB.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFMN.TO	ZLB.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.04%	-33.96%	+20.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.49%	-5.36%	+1.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.85%	-8.01%	+4.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-4.24%	-13.00%	+8.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-1.70%	+1.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.19%	-2.46%	+1.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	1.45%	-0.43%

Volatility

PFMN.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PICTON Market Neutral Equity Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO) is 1.73%, while BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that PFMN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFMN.TO	ZLB.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.73%	2.47%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.56%	6.38%	-2.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.69%	8.29%	-3.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.80%	9.44%	-1.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.78%	12.15%	-2.37%

PFMN.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFMN.TO has a 4.27% expense ratio, which is higher than ZLB.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFMN.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Dividend Comparison

PFMN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than ZLB.TO's 1.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PFMN.TO PICTON Market Neutral Equity Alternative Fund	0.78%	0.80%	0.00%	1.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF	1.88%	1.93%	2.37%	2.67%	2.66%	2.39%	2.83%	2.44%	2.76%	2.52%	2.94%	2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFMN.TO and ZLB.TO in my portfolio?

PFMN.TO and ZLB.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PFMN.TO or ZLB.TO?

On fees, ZLB.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFMN.TO or ZLB.TO?

ZLB.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 4.27% for PFMN.TO.

What is the main difference between PFMN.TO and ZLB.TO?

PFMN.TO is categorized as Long-Short, while ZLB.TO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: Picton Mahoney and BMO. Their fees differ too: 4.27% for PFMN.TO and 0.39% for ZLB.TO.