PFIX vs. QCLR
PFIX (Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF) and QCLR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFIX is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Simplify, while QCLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. PFIX is actively managed, while QCLR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PFIX returned 16.45%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for QCLR. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. PFIX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLR.
Performance
PFIX vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFIX achieves a -0.95% return, which is significantly lower than QCLR's -0.35% return.
PFIX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- -0.95%
- 1Y
- -9.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 20.64%
- 10Y*
- —
QCLR
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- 6M
- -1.69%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 1Y
- 5.85%
- 3Y*
- 12.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFIX vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF | -0.95% | 0.42% | 35.94% | 5.67% | 92.05% | -6.71% |
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | -0.35% | 11.27% | 20.27% | 28.87% | -18.87% | 2.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFIX and QCLR is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021 | -0.10 |
The correlation between PFIX and QCLR shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFIX vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank
PFIX
QCLR
PFIX vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFIX | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.11 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 0.57 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.56 | 2.04 | -2.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFIX vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFIX drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, which is greater than QCLR's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIX and QCLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFIX | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.17% | -21.77% | -14.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.64% | -10.22% | -15.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.17% | -13.58% | -22.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.33% | -2.61% | -15.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.21% | -6.09% | -11.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.30% | 2.88% | +14.42% |
Volatility
PFIX vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) has a higher volatility of 9.44% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) at 3.15%. This indicates that PFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFIX | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.44% | 3.15% | +6.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.16% | 6.95% | +15.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.34% | 9.95% | +19.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.55% | 12.37% | +26.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.20% | 12.37% | +25.83% |
PFIX vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFIX vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison
PFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.78%, less than QCLR's 14.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 9.78% | 9.92% | 3.40% | 87.92% | 0.63% | 0.00% |
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 14.99% | 14.89% | 8.89% | 0.47% | 0.27% | 1.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFIX and QCLR have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFIX has higher volatility (9.44%) compared to QCLR (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFIX dropped -36.17% vs QCLR's -21.77%.
On 3-year performance, PFIX leads with 16.45% vs 12.48% for QCLR. On fees, PFIX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QCLR has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PFIX has performed better with a 16.45% return vs 12.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFIX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLR.
QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 14.99%, compared with 9.78% for PFIX.
PFIX is categorized as Hedge Fund, while QCLR is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PFIX and 0.60% for QCLR.
QCLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFIX and QCLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer