PFIX vs. FLRT
PFIX (Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF) and FLRT (Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFIX is a Inverse Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify, while FLRT is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Pacer. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFIX returned 23.20%/yr vs 6.08%/yr for FLRT. Their -0.15 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PFIX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FLRT.
Performance
PFIX vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFIX achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly higher than FLRT's 2.39% return.
PFIX
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- 17.72%
- 6M
- 11.49%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 7.25%
- 3Y*
- 17.57%
- 5Y*
- 23.20%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.29%
FLRT
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.08%
- 10Y*
- 4.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.88M | $4.59M | $4.78M | |
| $6.29M | $5.62M | $16.95M |
PFIX vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 10.66% | 0.42% | 35.94% | 5.67% | 92.05% | -24.98% |
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 2.39% | 6.24% | 9.18% | 14.59% | -2.72% | 2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFIX and FLRT is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2021 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFIX vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank
PFIX
FLRT
PFIX vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) and Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFIX | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.76 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 2.89 | -2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.15 | 10.59 | -10.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFIX vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFIX drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, which is greater than FLRT's maximum drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIX and FLRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFIX | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.17% | -20.96% | -15.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.71% | -1.78% | -21.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.17% | -2.87% | -33.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.17% | -7.60% | -28.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.76% | 0.00% | -8.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.19% | -1.39% | -15.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.42% | 0.48% | +14.94% |
Volatility
PFIX vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT) at 0.29%. This indicates that PFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFIX | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.75% | 0.29% | +7.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.92% | 1.19% | +20.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.31% | 1.49% | +27.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.61% | 2.30% | +36.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.13% | 6.09% | +32.04% |
PFIX vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFIX vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison
PFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%, more than FLRT's 6.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 6.72% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 7.82% | 9.92% | 3.40% | 87.92% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFIX and FLRT have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFIX has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to FLRT (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFIX dropped -36.17% vs FLRT's -20.96%.
On 5-year performance, PFIX leads with 23.20% vs 6.08% for FLRT. On fees, PFIX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FLRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PFIX has performed better with a 23.20% return vs 6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFIX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FLRT.
PFIX has the higher dividend yield at 7.82%, compared with 6.72% for FLRT.
PFIX is categorized as Inverse Bonds, while FLRT is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PFIX and 0.60% for FLRT.
FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFIX and FLRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer