PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFIUX vs. RPIDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFIUX vs. RPIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund (PFIUX) and T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFIUX achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly higher than RPIDX's 1.03% return.


PFIUX

1D
0.20%
1M
1.06%
YTD
1.20%
6M
1.68%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
7.52%
5Y*
3.08%
10Y*
3.99%

RPIDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.03%
6M
2.44%
1Y
7.58%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
4.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFIUX vs. RPIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PFIUX
PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund
1.20%9.30%7.12%6.83%-7.48%0.32%5.43%4.24%
RPIDX
T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund
1.03%9.74%9.92%4.72%-0.76%6.21%2.71%6.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PFIUX and RPIDX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2019

0.14

The correlation between PFIUX and RPIDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFIUX vs. RPIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFIUX
PFIUX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PFIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

RPIDX
RPIDX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RPIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFIUX vs. RPIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund (PFIUX) and T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFIUXRPIDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.54

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

5.67

-3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.37

14.12

-4.75

PFIUX vs. RPIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFIUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the RPIDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFIUX and RPIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFIUX vs. RPIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFIUX drawdown since its inception was -10.67%, smaller than the maximum RPIDX drawdown of -19.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIUX and RPIDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFIUXRPIDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-19.95%

+9.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.89%

-1.34%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.89%

-3.17%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.53%

-7.31%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.86%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-1.86%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

0.54%

+0.20%

Volatility

PFIUX vs. RPIDX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund (PFIUX) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX) at 0.60%. This indicates that PFIUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFIUXRPIDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

0.60%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

2.68%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.50%

3.44%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.06%

3.84%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.87%

4.79%

-1.92%

PFIUX vs. RPIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFIUX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than RPIDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFIUX vs. RPIDX - Dividend Comparison

PFIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, less than RPIDX's 10.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFIUX
PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund
5.53%5.15%4.68%3.65%3.67%2.03%3.45%5.14%3.48%4.69%2.31%6.07%
RPIDX
T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund
10.81%9.91%9.20%6.64%7.97%5.34%7.14%4.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFIUX and RPIDX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFIUX has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to RPIDX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFIUX dropped -10.67% vs RPIDX's -19.95%.

RPIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFIUX and RPIDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer