PFIUX vs. LONZ
PFIUX (PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund) and LONZ (PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both funds - PFIUX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by PIMCO, while LONZ is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past 3 years, PFIUX returned 7.49%/yr vs 8.28%/yr for LONZ. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFIUX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for LONZ.
Performance
PFIUX vs. LONZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFIUX achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than LONZ's 1.79% return.
PFIUX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 7.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.98%
- 10Y*
- 3.91%
LONZ
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 5.52%
- 3Y*
- 8.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFIUX vs. LONZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFIUX PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund | 1.10% | 9.30% | 7.12% | 6.83% | -2.17% |
LONZ PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 1.79% | 5.05% | 9.85% | 12.56% | 0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFIUX and LONZ is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2022 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFIUX vs. LONZ — Risk / Return Rank
PFIUX
LONZ
PFIUX vs. LONZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund (PFIUX) and PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFIUX | LONZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.59 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 2.73 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.45 | 11.31 | -0.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFIUX | LONZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.46 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 2.34 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
PFIUX vs. LONZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFIUX drawdown since its inception was -10.67%, which is greater than LONZ's maximum drawdown of -4.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIUX and LONZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFIUX | LONZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -4.19% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.89% | -2.03% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.89% | -4.19% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.05% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -0.47% | -1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | 0.49% | +0.25% |
Volatility
PFIUX vs. LONZ - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund (PFIUX) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ) at 0.54%. This indicates that PFIUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LONZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFIUX | LONZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.43% | 0.54% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 2.05% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.40% | 2.26% | +1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.03% | 3.21% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.87% | 3.21% | -0.34% |
PFIUX vs. LONZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFIUX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than LONZ's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFIUX vs. LONZ - Dividend Comparison
PFIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, less than LONZ's 8.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LONZ PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 8.14% | 6.60% | 8.16% | 8.29% | 3.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFIUX PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund | 5.54% | 5.15% | 4.68% | 3.65% | 3.67% | 2.03% | 3.45% | 5.14% | 3.48% | 4.69% | 2.31% | 6.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFIUX and LONZ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFIUX has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to LONZ (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFIUX dropped -10.67% vs LONZ's -4.19%.
LONZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFIUX and LONZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer