PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFH vs. AEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PFH vs. AEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prudential Financial, Inc. 4.125% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2060 (PFH) and American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFH achieves a -2.74% return, which is significantly lower than AEP's 19.24% return.


PFH

1D
-0.25%
1M
-0.37%
6M
-5.64%
YTD
-2.74%
1Y
-3.27%
3Y*
-0.98%
5Y*
-4.21%
10Y*

AEP

1D
1.18%
1M
4.80%
6M
17.61%
YTD
19.24%
1Y
32.64%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
13.70%
10Y*
10.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFH vs. AEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PFH
Prudential Financial, Inc. 4.125% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2060
-2.74%-1.37%0.92%12.32%-26.78%2.36%3.68%
AEP
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
19.24%29.38%18.18%-10.98%10.38%10.68%7.88%

Correlation

The correlation between PFH and AEP is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2020

0.17

The correlation between PFH and AEP shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PFH:

$40.06B

AEP:

$73.69B

EPS

PFH:

$9.88

AEP:

$6.83

PE Ratio

PFH:

1.65

AEP:

19.83

PEG Ratio

PFH:

0.07

AEP:

2.23

PS Ratio

PFH:

0.12

AEP:

3.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

PFH:

$47.43B

AEP:

$22.16B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PFH:

$14.72B

AEP:

$8.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

PFH:

$4.02B

AEP:

$8.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFH vs. AEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFH
PFH Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFH Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
PFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFH Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

AEP
AEP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFH vs. AEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Financial, Inc. 4.125% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2060 (PFH) and American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFHAEPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.30

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

3.51

-3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.74

8.56

-9.30

PFH vs. AEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFH Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the AEP Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFH and AEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFH vs. AEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFH drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, smaller than the maximum AEP drawdown of -62.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFH and AEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFHAEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.58%

-62.75%

+34.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.03%

-9.09%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-18.04%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.58%

-29.56%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.42%

-2.35%

-18.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.38%

-17.53%

+4.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.15%

3.72%

+1.43%

Volatility

PFH vs. AEP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Prudential Financial, Inc. 4.125% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2060 (PFH) is 2.50%, while American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that PFH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFHAEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

6.07%

-3.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.36%

14.22%

-7.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.38%

18.92%

-9.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.89%

20.10%

-6.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.04%

21.03%

-7.99%

Dividends

PFH vs. AEP - Dividend Comparison

PFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than AEP's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEP
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
2.79%3.24%3.87%4.15%3.34%3.37%3.41%2.87%3.39%3.25%3.61%3.69%
PFH
Prudential Financial, Inc. 4.125% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2060
6.33%5.98%5.57%5.33%5.65%3.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PFH vs. AEP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prudential Financial, Inc. 4.125% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2060 and American Electric Power Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
6.02B
(PFH) Total Revenue
(AEP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PFH and AEP have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEP has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to PFH (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFH dropped -28.58% vs AEP's -62.75%.

AEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFH and AEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer