PFFSX vs. TANDX
PFFSX (PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund) and TANDX (Castle Tandem Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PFFSX returned 15.48%/yr vs 1.44%/yr for TANDX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFFSX charges 2.03%/yr vs 1.59%/yr for TANDX.
Performance
PFFSX vs. TANDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFFSX achieves a 14.66% return, which is significantly higher than TANDX's -13.70% return.
PFFSX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 14.66%
- 6M
- 14.66%
- 1Y
- 30.53%
- 3Y*
- 23.58%
- 5Y*
- 15.48%
- 10Y*
- —
TANDX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- YTD
- -13.70%
- 6M
- -13.65%
- 1Y
- -16.12%
- 3Y*
- 0.95%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- —
PFFSX vs. TANDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFSX PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund | 14.66% | 16.17% | 30.14% | 18.01% | -11.57% | 26.30% | 24.12% |
TANDX Castle Tandem Fund | -13.70% | 3.67% | 7.66% | 8.42% | -7.87% | 19.03% | 17.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFFSX and TANDX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2020 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PFFSX and TANDX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFFSX vs. TANDX — Risk / Return Rank
PFFSX
TANDX
PFFSX vs. TANDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFFSX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 0.73 | +0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | -0.98 | +4.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.11 | -2.34 | +15.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFFSX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | -1.76 | +4.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.00 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 0.01 | +0.99 |
Drawdowns
PFFSX vs. TANDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFSX drawdown since its inception was -24.92%, smaller than the maximum TANDX drawdown of -93.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFSX and TANDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFFSX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.92% | -93.96% | +69.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.11% | -16.62% | +6.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.45% | -93.96% | +72.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.92% | -93.96% | +69.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -93.96% | +93.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -20.29% | +14.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 6.93% | -4.58% |
Volatility
PFFSX vs. TANDX - Volatility Comparison
PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX) at 2.53%. This indicates that PFFSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TANDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFFSX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 2.53% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 7.19% | +2.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.43% | 9.27% | +4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 595.57% | -576.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 496.41% | -477.62% |
PFFSX vs. TANDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFSX has a 2.03% expense ratio, which is higher than TANDX's 1.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFFSX vs. TANDX - Dividend Comparison
PFFSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.00%, more than TANDX's 7.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFSX PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund | 15.00% | 17.19% | 19.78% | 2.40% | 10.90% | 6.73% | 5.51% | 0.00% |
TANDX Castle Tandem Fund | 7.15% | 6.17% | 3.71% | 2.10% | 1.48% | 4.57% | 0.33% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFFSX and TANDX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFFSX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to TANDX (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFSX dropped -24.92% vs TANDX's -93.96%.
PFFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFFSX and TANDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer