PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFSX vs. RCKSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFSX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFSX achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly lower than RCKSX's 15.52% return.


PFFSX

1D
-1.36%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
12.01%
6M
10.34%
1Y
24.65%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
14.61%
10Y*

RCKSX

1D
0.04%
1M
0.64%
YTD
15.52%
6M
13.43%
1Y
19.65%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
11.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFSX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PFFSX
PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund
12.01%16.17%30.14%18.01%-11.57%26.30%24.12%
RCKSX
Rock Oak Core Growth Fund
15.52%12.99%15.12%15.57%-18.09%9.96%29.55%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFSX and RCKSX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020

0.82

The correlation between PFFSX and RCKSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFSX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFSX
PFFSX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PFFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

RCKSX
RCKSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
RCKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RCKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFSX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFFSXRCKSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

4.90

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.94

13.53

-2.59

PFFSX vs. RCKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the RCKSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFSX and RCKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFFSX vs. RCKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFSX drawdown since its inception was -24.92%, smaller than the maximum RCKSX drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFSX and RCKSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFSXRCKSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.92%

-57.88%

+32.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.11%

-4.14%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.45%

-18.22%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.92%

-22.54%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-0.42%

-2.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.94%

-9.48%

+3.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

1.50%

+0.91%

Volatility

PFFSX vs. RCKSX - Volatility Comparison

PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) at 3.27%. This indicates that PFFSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFSXRCKSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

3.27%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.91%

8.06%

+2.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.07%

11.73%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.88%

15.64%

+3.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.81%

17.49%

+1.32%

PFFSX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFSX has a 2.03% expense ratio, which is higher than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFFSX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison

PFFSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.35%, more than RCKSX's 5.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFFSX
PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund
15.35%17.19%19.78%2.40%10.90%6.73%5.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RCKSX
Rock Oak Core Growth Fund
5.42%6.26%0.47%0.71%1.00%4.31%16.56%3.18%0.59%5.91%0.70%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFSX and RCKSX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFFSX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to RCKSX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFSX dropped -24.92% vs RCKSX's -57.88%.

PFFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFSX and RCKSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer