PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFSX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFSX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFSX achieves a 14.66% return, which is significantly higher than FSKAX's 11.22% return.


PFFSX

1D
-0.45%
1M
4.92%
YTD
14.66%
6M
14.66%
1Y
30.53%
3Y*
23.58%
5Y*
15.48%
10Y*

FSKAX

1D
-0.77%
1M
4.09%
YTD
11.22%
6M
10.94%
1Y
28.11%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFSX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PFFSX
PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund
14.66%16.17%30.14%18.01%-11.57%26.30%24.12%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
11.22%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%38.97%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFSX and FSKAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2020

0.95

The correlation between PFFSX and FSKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFSX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFSX
PFFSX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PFFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFSX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFFSXFSKAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.41

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

3.17

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.11

14.55

-1.43

PFFSX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFSX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFFSXFSKAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.30

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.73

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.85

+0.15

Drawdowns

PFFSX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFSX drawdown since its inception was -24.92%, smaller than the maximum FSKAX drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFSX and FSKAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFSXFSKAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.92%

-35.01%

+10.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.11%

-8.92%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.45%

-19.43%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.92%

-25.39%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.77%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-4.02%

-1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

1.94%

+0.41%

Volatility

PFFSX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) is 2.86%, while Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that PFFSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFSXFSKAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

3.08%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

9.25%

+0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.43%

12.29%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.78%

17.41%

+1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.79%

18.46%

+0.33%

PFFSX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFSX has a 2.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFFSX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

PFFSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.00%, more than FSKAX's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.94%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%
PFFSX
PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund
15.00%17.19%19.78%2.40%10.90%6.73%5.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, PFFSX and FSKAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSKAX has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to PFFSX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFSX dropped -24.92% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

PFFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFSX and FSKAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer