PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFRX vs. TRRJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFRX vs. TRRJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F (PFFRX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFRX achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than TRRJX's 8.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PFFRX has underperformed TRRJX with an annualized return of 4.70%, while TRRJX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.76% annualized return.


PFFRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.43%
6M
2.03%
1Y
5.70%
3Y*
7.73%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
4.70%

TRRJX

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.46%
YTD
8.73%
6M
4.27%
1Y
15.02%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
9.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFRX vs. TRRJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFFRX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F
1.43%6.57%7.54%10.89%-2.14%4.64%2.29%8.69%0.16%3.66%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
8.73%10.96%11.99%18.14%-17.96%15.21%17.04%23.72%-6.95%20.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFRX and TRRJX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2010

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFRX vs. TRRJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFRX
PFFRX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PFFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

TRRJX
TRRJX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
TRRJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRJX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRJX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFRX vs. TRRJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F (PFFRX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFFRXTRRJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.95

1.29

+0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

1.95

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.82

7.54

+7.28

PFFRX vs. TRRJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the TRRJX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFRX and TRRJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFFRXTRRJXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

1.51

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.92

0.50

+1.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.24

0.72

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

0.50

+0.88

Drawdowns

PFFRX vs. TRRJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFRX drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, smaller than the maximum TRRJX drawdown of -53.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFRX and TRRJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFRXTRRJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.70%

-53.57%

+33.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.46%

-8.06%

+6.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.29%

-12.52%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.05%

-25.85%

+19.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.70%

-30.14%

+10.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.55%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-6.65%

+5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

2.06%

-1.67%

Volatility

PFFRX vs. TRRJX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F (PFFRX) is 0.63%, while T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) has a volatility of 2.98%. This indicates that PFFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRRJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFRXTRRJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

2.98%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.74%

8.83%

-7.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33%

10.46%

-8.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.72%

12.84%

-10.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.80%

13.54%

-9.74%

PFFRX vs. TRRJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TRRJX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFFRX vs. TRRJX - Dividend Comparison

PFFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%, while TRRJX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFFRX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F
6.86%7.09%6.92%7.21%4.03%3.81%4.18%5.01%5.04%4.20%4.18%4.32%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
0.00%0.00%2.36%4.68%9.67%6.89%4.80%5.68%8.55%3.80%2.89%4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFRX and TRRJX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRRJX has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to PFFRX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFRX dropped -19.70% vs TRRJX's -53.57%.

PFFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFRX and TRRJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer