PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFR vs. NFLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFR vs. NFLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) and Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFR achieves a 2.85% return, which is significantly higher than NFLT's 2.15% return.


PFFR

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.29%
6M
1.42%
YTD
2.85%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.40%

NFLT

1D
0.14%
1M
0.01%
6M
1.57%
YTD
2.15%
1Y
5.38%
3Y*
7.29%
5Y*
3.10%
10Y*
3.87%
ALL TIME*
4.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.33M$1.87M$2.08M
$783.15K$723.76K$619.25K

PFFR vs. NFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFFR
InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF
2.85%5.36%7.12%21.04%-23.90%6.76%0.19%20.28%-7.45%7.82%
NFLT
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF
2.15%8.77%6.05%9.16%-9.49%1.18%8.02%10.13%-2.68%5.17%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFR and NFLT is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2017

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFR vs. NFLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFFR
PFFR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PFFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLT
NFLT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
NFLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLT Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFFR vs. NFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) and Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFFRNFLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.24

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

2.24

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

9.10

-7.73

PFFR vs. NFLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the NFLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFR and NFLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFFR vs. NFLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFR drawdown since its inception was -53.02%, which is greater than NFLT's maximum drawdown of -15.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFR and NFLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFRNFLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.02%

-15.17%

-37.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-2.42%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.16%

-3.15%

-8.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.80%

-13.42%

-16.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-0.26%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.90%

-2.08%

-4.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

0.59%

+2.33%

Volatility

PFFR vs. NFLT - Volatility Comparison

InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) has a higher volatility of 2.21% compared to Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) at 1.04%. This indicates that PFFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFRNFLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

1.04%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.28%

3.21%

+3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.07%

4.06%

+4.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.54%

4.49%

+6.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.37%

4.92%

+15.45%

PFFR vs. NFLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLT's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFFR vs. NFLT - Dividend Comparison

PFFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%, more than NFLT's 5.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFLT
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF
5.44%5.74%5.76%6.02%4.16%3.41%3.63%4.33%4.81%6.23%5.30%0.67%
PFFR
InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF
8.27%7.99%7.78%7.72%8.60%6.08%6.11%5.77%6.48%6.59%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFR and NFLT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFFR has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to NFLT (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFR dropped -53.02% vs NFLT's -15.17%.

On 5-year performance, NFLT leads with 3.10% vs 0.99% for PFFR. On fees, PFFR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, NFLT has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NFLT has performed better with a 3.10% return vs 0.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFFR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for NFLT.

PFFR has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 5.44% for NFLT.

PFFR is categorized as REIT, while NFLT is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PFFR and 0.50% for NFLT.

NFLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFR and NFLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer