PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFL vs. SHRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PFFL vs. SHRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN (PFFL) and Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PFFL vs. SHRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PFFL
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN
-3.25%2.18%4.77%8.97%
SHRT
Gotham Short Strategies ETF
-2.73%-0.91%-1.44%-5.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFL achieves a -3.25% return, which is significantly lower than SHRT's -2.73% return.


PFFL

1D
1.16%
1M
-6.53%
YTD
-3.25%
6M
-4.74%
1Y
2.41%
3Y*
2.52%
5Y*
-5.88%
10Y*

SHRT

1D
-1.51%
1M
5.66%
YTD
-2.73%
6M
-0.78%
1Y
-8.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PFFL vs. SHRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than SHRT's 1.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PFFL vs. SHRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFL
PFFL Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
PFFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFL Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SHRT
SHRT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SHRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHRT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
SHRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHRT Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFL vs. SHRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN (PFFL) and Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFFLSHRTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.12

-0.61

+0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.30

-0.84

+1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.91

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

-0.49

+0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.43

-0.89

+1.33

PFFL vs. SHRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFL Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the SHRT Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFL and SHRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFFLSHRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

-0.61

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

-0.36

+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between PFFL and SHRT is -0.28. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

PFFL vs. SHRT - Dividend Comparison

PFFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.52%, more than SHRT's 0.07% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PFFL
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN
13.52%13.27%13.76%13.71%13.90%8.82%9.75%11.21%2.02%
SHRT
Gotham Short Strategies ETF
0.07%0.07%0.85%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PFFL vs. SHRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFL drawdown since its inception was -80.68%, which is greater than SHRT's maximum drawdown of -18.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFL and SHRT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFLSHRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.68%

-18.97%

-61.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-17.65%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.40%

-12.77%

-27.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.32%

-7.21%

-21.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.78%

9.62%

-4.84%

Volatility

PFFL vs. SHRT - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN (PFFL) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) at 6.06%. This indicates that PFFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PFFLSHRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

6.06%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

10.51%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.43%

14.59%

+4.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.54%

12.66%

+10.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.94%

12.66%

+43.28%