PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFFX vs. GLOSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFFX vs. GLOSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG Equity Index Focused Strategy Fund (PFFFX) and Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A (GLOSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFFX achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly lower than GLOSX's 15.00% return.


PFFFX

1D
-0.83%
1M
3.78%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.96%
1Y
27.22%
3Y*
22.23%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*

GLOSX

1D
-0.94%
1M
3.60%
YTD
15.00%
6M
16.65%
1Y
39.75%
3Y*
25.40%
5Y*
14.83%
10Y*
13.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFFX vs. GLOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PFFFX
PFG Equity Index Focused Strategy Fund
11.56%19.55%25.16%19.36%-18.75%18.54%31.91%
GLOSX
Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A
15.00%41.25%11.45%16.70%-9.75%23.28%39.54%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFFX and GLOSX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2020

0.92

The correlation between PFFFX and GLOSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFFX vs. GLOSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFFX
PFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

GLOSX
GLOSX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GLOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
GLOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFFX vs. GLOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG Equity Index Focused Strategy Fund (PFFFX) and Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A (GLOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFFFXGLOSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.54

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

4.00

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.06

16.14

-3.08

PFFFX vs. GLOSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the GLOSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFFX and GLOSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFFFXGLOSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

3.02

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.96

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.48

+0.52

Drawdowns

PFFFX vs. GLOSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFFX drawdown since its inception was -29.61%, smaller than the maximum GLOSX drawdown of -54.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFFX and GLOSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFFXGLOSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.61%

-54.40%

+24.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-10.04%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.24%

-14.66%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.61%

-23.72%

-5.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-0.94%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.94%

-9.79%

+2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.49%

-0.38%

Volatility

PFFFX vs. GLOSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PFG Equity Index Focused Strategy Fund (PFFFX) is 3.60%, while Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A (GLOSX) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that PFFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFFXGLOSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

4.44%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.80%

10.29%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

13.29%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.58%

15.60%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

16.84%

-0.27%

PFFFX vs. GLOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFFX has a 2.02% expense ratio, which is higher than GLOSX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFFFX vs. GLOSX - Dividend Comparison

PFFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than GLOSX's 10.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLOSX
Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A
10.03%11.53%7.73%1.55%6.04%21.00%0.87%0.93%10.44%1.27%1.25%0.60%
PFFFX
PFG Equity Index Focused Strategy Fund
3.15%3.51%16.43%3.69%4.32%5.01%2.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFFX and GLOSX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLOSX has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to PFFFX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFFX dropped -29.61% vs GLOSX's -54.40%.

GLOSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFFX and GLOSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer