PFF vs. QTPI
PFF (iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF) and QTPI (North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. PFF is passively managed, while QTPI is actively managed. Over the past year, PFF returned 9.35% vs 5.09% for QTPI. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFF charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QTPI.
Performance
PFF vs. QTPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFF achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly higher than QTPI's 0.84% return.
PFF
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 3.41%
- 1Y
- 9.35%
- 3Y*
- 6.70%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
QTPI
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFF vs. QTPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 2.93% | 4.87% | -0.13% |
QTPI North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 0.84% | 7.37% | 0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFF and QTPI is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024 | 0.67 |
The correlation between PFF and QTPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFF vs. QTPI — Risk / Return Rank
PFF
QTPI
PFF vs. QTPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFF | QTPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.22 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 2.42 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.51 | 9.97 | -4.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFF | QTPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 1.23 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 1.19 | -0.99 |
Drawdowns
PFF vs. QTPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFF drawdown since its inception was -65.55%, which is greater than QTPI's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFF and QTPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFF | QTPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.55% | -4.08% | -61.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.28% | -2.11% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -0.68% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.77% | -0.40% | -5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 0.52% | +1.18% |
Volatility
PFF vs. QTPI - Volatility Comparison
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) has a higher volatility of 2.09% compared to North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI) at 1.42%. This indicates that PFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFF | QTPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.09% | 1.42% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.09% | 3.19% | +1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.75% | 4.55% | +2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.30% | 4.98% | +5.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.66% | 4.98% | +7.68% |
PFF vs. QTPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFF has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than QTPI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFF vs. QTPI - Dividend Comparison
PFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, more than QTPI's 4.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 5.47% | 6.30% | 6.32% | 6.63% | 6.01% | 4.45% | 4.79% | 5.31% | 6.32% | 5.59% | 5.85% | 5.76% |
QTPI North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 4.44% | 4.58% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFF and QTPI have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFF has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to QTPI (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFF dropped -65.55% vs QTPI's -4.08%.
On 1-year performance, PFF leads with 9.35% vs 5.09% for QTPI. On fees, PFF is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, QTPI has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PFF has performed better with a 9.35% return vs 5.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFF is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTPI.
PFF has the higher dividend yield at 5.47%, compared with 4.44% for QTPI.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and North Square. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for PFF and 0.60% for QTPI.
PFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFF and QTPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer