PFF vs. CSPF
PFF (iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF) and CSPF (Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. PFF is passively managed, while CSPF is actively managed. Over the past year, PFF returned 7.10% vs 8.38% for CSPF. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFF charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CSPF.
Performance
PFF vs. CSPF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFF achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than CSPF's 3.08% return.
PFF
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 7.10%
- 3Y*
- 6.69%
- 5Y*
- 1.03%
- 10Y*
- 3.21%
CSPF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 3.08%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 8.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFF vs. CSPF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 1.44% | 3.92% |
CSPF Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF | 3.08% | 8.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFF and CSPF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025 | 0.53 |
The correlation between PFF and CSPF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFF vs. CSPF — Risk / Return Rank
PFF
CSPF
PFF vs. CSPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFF | CSPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.40 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 2.75 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.07 | 12.46 | -8.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFF vs. CSPF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFF drawdown since its inception was -65.55%, which is greater than CSPF's maximum drawdown of -3.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFF and CSPF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFF | CSPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.55% | -3.06% | -62.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.28% | -3.06% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -0.11% | -2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -0.43% | -5.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 0.67% | +1.08% |
Volatility
PFF vs. CSPF - Volatility Comparison
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) has a higher volatility of 2.42% compared to Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF) at 1.16%. This indicates that PFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFF | CSPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 1.16% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.42% | 3.15% | +2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.03% | 4.15% | +2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.35% | 4.17% | +6.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.68% | 4.17% | +8.51% |
PFF vs. CSPF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFF has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than CSPF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFF vs. CSPF - Dividend Comparison
PFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%, more than CSPF's 5.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSPF Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF | 5.14% | 4.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 5.55% | 6.30% | 6.32% | 6.63% | 6.01% | 4.45% | 4.79% | 5.31% | 6.32% | 5.59% | 5.85% | 5.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFF and CSPF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFF has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to CSPF (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFF dropped -65.55% vs CSPF's -3.06%.
On 1-year performance, CSPF leads with 8.38% vs 7.10% for PFF. On fees, PFF is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, CSPF has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSPF has performed better with a 8.38% return vs 7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFF is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CSPF.
PFF has the higher dividend yield at 5.55%, compared with 5.14% for CSPF.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Cohen & Steers. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for PFF and 0.59% for CSPF.
CSPF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFF and CSPF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer