PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFD vs. FCCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFD vs. FCCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund (PFD) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C (FCCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFD achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly lower than FCCVX's 24.86% return. Over the past 10 years, PFD has underperformed FCCVX with an annualized return of 4.07%, while FCCVX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.17% annualized return.


PFD

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
-0.69%
6M
0.53%
1Y
10.91%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
-1.07%
10Y*
4.07%

FCCVX

1D
1.15%
1M
7.30%
YTD
24.86%
6M
24.23%
1Y
43.01%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
12.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFD vs. FCCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFD
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund
-0.69%12.96%21.69%-4.87%-31.92%-2.03%29.67%43.46%-17.25%10.69%
FCCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C
24.86%17.04%7.28%10.24%-16.22%8.77%41.00%27.26%-2.32%8.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PFD and FCCVX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2009

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFD vs. FCCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFD
PFD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFD Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
PFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FCCVX
FCCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FCCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FCCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFD vs. FCCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund (PFD) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C (FCCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFDFCCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.51

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

6.14

-4.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.51

23.77

-19.26

PFD vs. FCCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFD Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the FCCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFD and FCCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFDFCCVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

2.99

-1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.64

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.90

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.95

-0.78

Drawdowns

PFD vs. FCCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFD drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, which is greater than FCCVX's maximum drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFD and FCCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFDFCCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.70%

-25.13%

-56.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.05%

-7.21%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-18.98%

+4.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.60%

-24.66%

-20.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.39%

-25.13%

-28.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.12%

0.00%

-21.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.23%

-6.19%

-11.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

1.86%

+0.56%

Volatility

PFD vs. FCCVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund (PFD) is 1.85%, while Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C (FCCVX) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that PFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFDFCCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

4.85%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.72%

11.83%

-5.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.70%

14.82%

-6.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.47%

13.46%

+3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.50%

13.64%

+9.86%

PFD vs. FCCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFD has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FCCVX's 1.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFD vs. FCCVX - Dividend Comparison

PFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.98%, less than FCCVX's 8.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C
8.06%10.47%1.32%1.12%2.62%19.63%9.96%2.31%8.75%3.35%3.85%9.24%
PFD
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund
6.98%6.47%6.46%6.94%7.97%5.82%5.09%5.85%8.14%6.85%7.44%8.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFD and FCCVX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCCVX has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to PFD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFD dropped -81.70% vs FCCVX's -25.13%.

FCCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFD and FCCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer