PFBPX vs. PCN
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class I-2 (PFBPX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN).
PFBPX is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Apr 30, 2008. PCN is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 20, 2001.
Performance
PFBPX vs. PCN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PFBPX vs. PCN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFBPX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class I-2 | -2.25% | 4.23% | 5.60% | 9.39% | -10.42% | -1.76% | 6.05% | 7.53% | 2.53% | 3.42% |
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund | -4.21% | 5.55% | 19.52% | 16.22% | -22.88% | 6.93% | -2.19% | 39.10% | -5.94% | 26.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFBPX achieves a -2.25% return, which is significantly higher than PCN's -4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, PFBPX has underperformed PCN with an annualized return of 2.66%, while PCN has yielded a comparatively higher 8.27% annualized return.
PFBPX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -2.25%
- 6M
- -1.24%
- 1Y
- 1.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- 0.98%
- 10Y*
- 2.66%
PCN
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -6.22%
- 1Y
- -3.05%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PFBPX vs. PCN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFBPX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than PCN's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PFBPX vs. PCN — Risk / Return Rank
PFBPX
PCN
PFBPX vs. PCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class I-2 (PFBPX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFBPX | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | -0.20 | +0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.84 | -0.15 | +0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.97 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | -0.20 | +0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.70 | -0.66 | +3.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFBPX | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | -0.20 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.14 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.38 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.39 | +0.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between PFBPX and PCN is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PFBPX vs. PCN - Dividend Comparison
PFBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than PCN's 11.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFBPX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class I-2 | 3.78% | 4.13% | 4.82% | 2.91% | 3.55% | 1.45% | 2.35% | 6.76% | 2.80% | 1.36% | 1.28% | 9.01% |
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund | 11.34% | 10.58% | 10.06% | 10.88% | 12.66% | 7.89% | 7.83% | 7.37% | 9.60% | 7.85% | 11.98% | 10.22% |
Drawdowns
PFBPX vs. PCN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFBPX drawdown since its inception was -16.52%, smaller than the maximum PCN drawdown of -61.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFBPX and PCN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFBPX | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.52% | -61.12% | +44.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.99% | -13.78% | +9.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.80% | -33.39% | +19.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.00% | -50.27% | +36.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | -6.71% | +3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | -7.22% | +4.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 4.32% | -3.45% |
Volatility
PFBPX vs. PCN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class I-2 (PFBPX) is 1.93%, while PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) has a volatility of 5.81%. This indicates that PFBPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PFBPX | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.93% | 5.81% | -3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.52% | 8.64% | -6.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.37% | 15.69% | -12.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.46% | 16.55% | -13.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.07% | 21.97% | -18.90% |