PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFADX vs. PFFSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFADX vs. PFFSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX) and PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFADX achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly lower than PFFSX's 14.66% return.


PFADX

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.10%
YTD
3.08%
6M
3.18%
1Y
8.62%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
1.27%
10Y*

PFFSX

1D
-0.45%
1M
4.92%
YTD
14.66%
6M
14.66%
1Y
30.53%
3Y*
23.58%
5Y*
15.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFADX vs. PFFSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PFADX
PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund
3.08%7.07%2.13%3.69%-9.50%3.85%10.71%
PFFSX
PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund
14.66%16.17%30.14%18.01%-11.57%26.30%24.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PFADX and PFFSX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2020

0.58

The correlation between PFADX and PFFSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFADX vs. PFFSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFADX
PFADX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PFADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFADX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PFADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFADX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFSX
PFFSX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PFFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFADX vs. PFFSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX) and PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFADXPFFSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

3.07

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

13.11

-4.47

PFADX vs. PFFSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFADX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the PFFSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFADX and PFFSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFADXPFFSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.31

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.83

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

1.00

-0.59

Drawdowns

PFADX vs. PFFSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFADX drawdown since its inception was -16.64%, smaller than the maximum PFFSX drawdown of -24.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFADX and PFFSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFADXPFFSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.64%

-24.92%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.63%

-10.11%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.38%

-21.45%

+15.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.64%

-24.92%

+8.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-0.45%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-5.98%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

2.35%

-1.31%

Volatility

PFADX vs. PFFSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX) is 1.53%, while PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that PFADX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFFSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFADXPFFSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

2.86%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.40%

9.95%

-6.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.28%

13.43%

-9.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.86%

18.78%

-12.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.54%

18.79%

-13.25%

PFADX vs. PFFSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFADX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFSX's 2.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFADX vs. PFFSX - Dividend Comparison

PFADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than PFFSX's 15.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFADX
PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund
2.39%2.46%2.89%1.04%5.33%3.46%0.08%1.51%0.91%0.52%
PFFSX
PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund
15.00%17.19%19.78%2.40%10.90%6.73%5.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFADX and PFFSX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFFSX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to PFADX (1.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFADX dropped -16.64% vs PFFSX's -24.92%.

PFFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFADX and PFFSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer