PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFADX vs. PDAVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFADX vs. PDAVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX) and PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (PDAVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFADX achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly lower than PDAVX's 5.39% return.


PFADX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.20%
6M
0.50%
YTD
2.36%
1Y
6.29%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.14%

PDAVX

1D
0.45%
1M
0.00%
6M
2.97%
YTD
5.39%
1Y
12.84%
3Y*
9.69%
5Y*
2.57%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PFADX vs. PDAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFADX
PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund
2.36%7.07%2.13%3.69%-9.50%3.85%7.25%8.16%-5.20%0.00%
PDAVX
PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund
5.39%14.21%5.48%7.60%-16.77%6.51%12.87%14.84%-9.55%-0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PFADX and PDAVX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2017

0.68

The correlation between PFADX and PDAVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFADX vs. PDAVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFADX
PFADX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PFADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFADX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
PFADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFADX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

PDAVX
PDAVX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PDAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PDAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFADX vs. PDAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX) and PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (PDAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFADXPDAVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.17

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

1.38

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.10

4.85

+0.25

PFADX vs. PDAVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFADX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the PDAVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFADX and PDAVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFADX vs. PDAVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFADX drawdown since its inception was -16.64%, smaller than the maximum PDAVX drawdown of -25.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFADX and PDAVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFADXPDAVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.64%

-25.58%

+8.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.63%

-8.89%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.38%

-12.17%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.64%

-24.53%

+7.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-2.81%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.23%

-7.16%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

2.52%

-1.26%

Volatility

PFADX vs. PDAVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX) is 1.09%, while PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (PDAVX) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that PFADX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFADXPDAVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

3.64%

-2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.64%

10.47%

-6.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.42%

12.54%

-8.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.88%

10.60%

-4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.52%

10.52%

-5.00%

PFADX vs. PDAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFADX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PDAVX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFADX vs. PDAVX - Dividend Comparison

PFADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than PDAVX's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDAVX
PineBridge Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund
1.65%1.74%2.35%2.74%0.00%5.28%1.19%1.38%2.54%5.75%
PFADX
PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund
2.41%2.46%2.89%1.04%5.33%3.46%0.08%1.51%0.91%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFADX and PDAVX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDAVX has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to PFADX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFADX dropped -16.64% vs PDAVX's -25.58%.

PFADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFADX and PDAVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer