PFADX vs. IMRFX
Compare and contrast key facts about PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX) and Columbia Global Opportunities Fund (IMRFX).
PFADX is managed by The Pacific Financial Group. It was launched on Dec 10, 2017. IMRFX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jan 22, 1985.
Performance
PFADX vs. IMRFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PFADX vs. IMRFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFADX PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund | 0.82% | 7.07% | 2.13% | 3.69% | -9.50% | 3.85% | 7.25% | 8.16% | -5.20% | 0.00% |
IMRFX Columbia Global Opportunities Fund | -3.77% | 15.88% | 7.46% | 11.29% | -21.02% | 6.25% | 12.55% | 15.62% | -7.03% | 0.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFADX achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly higher than IMRFX's -3.77% return.
PFADX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -3.44%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- 6.58%
- 3Y*
- 4.11%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- —
IMRFX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -7.67%
- YTD
- -3.77%
- 6M
- -1.67%
- 1Y
- 12.35%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- 2.08%
- 10Y*
- 5.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PFADX vs. IMRFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFADX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than IMRFX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PFADX vs. IMRFX — Risk / Return Rank
PFADX
IMRFX
PFADX vs. IMRFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX) and Columbia Global Opportunities Fund (IMRFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFADX | IMRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 1.18 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.75 | 1.66 | +0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.23 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 1.43 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.67 | 6.22 | -0.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFADX | IMRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.18 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.19 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.60 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between PFADX and IMRFX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PFADX vs. IMRFX - Dividend Comparison
PFADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than IMRFX's 18.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFADX PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund | 2.44% | 2.46% | 2.89% | 1.04% | 5.33% | 3.46% | 0.08% | 1.51% | 0.91% | 0.52% | 0.00% |
IMRFX Columbia Global Opportunities Fund | 18.57% | 17.87% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 6.62% | 7.92% | 4.40% | 1.75% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 2.77% |
Drawdowns
PFADX vs. IMRFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFADX drawdown since its inception was -16.64%, smaller than the maximum IMRFX drawdown of -45.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFADX and IMRFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFADX | IMRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.64% | -45.67% | +29.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.21% | -8.07% | +3.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.64% | -28.77% | +12.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.44% | -8.07% | +4.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -7.35% | +1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 1.85% | -0.69% |
Volatility
PFADX vs. IMRFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX) is 1.81%, while Columbia Global Opportunities Fund (IMRFX) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that PFADX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMRFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PFADX | IMRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.81% | 4.46% | -2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.06% | 7.08% | -4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.95% | 10.52% | -5.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.85% | 10.82% | -4.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.55% | 10.34% | -4.79% |