PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMRFX vs. CMTFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMRFX vs. CMTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Global Opportunities Fund (IMRFX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMRFX achieves a 6.86% return, which is significantly lower than CMTFX's 30.27% return. Over the past 10 years, IMRFX has underperformed CMTFX with an annualized return of 5.96%, while CMTFX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.85% annualized return.


IMRFX

1D
0.21%
1M
2.38%
YTD
6.86%
6M
7.58%
1Y
19.16%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*
5.96%

CMTFX

1D
2.50%
1M
15.69%
YTD
30.27%
6M
29.58%
1Y
61.69%
3Y*
35.75%
5Y*
20.59%
10Y*
24.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMRFX vs. CMTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMRFX
Columbia Global Opportunities Fund
6.86%15.88%7.46%11.29%-21.02%6.25%12.55%15.62%-7.03%18.17%
CMTFX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund
30.27%25.10%31.72%56.85%-34.63%23.04%49.65%44.21%-1.26%43.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IMRFX and CMTFX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2000

0.81

The correlation between IMRFX and CMTFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMRFX vs. CMTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMRFX
IMRFX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IMRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IMRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

CMTFX
CMTFX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CMTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CMTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMRFX vs. CMTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Global Opportunities Fund (IMRFX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMRFXCMTFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.11

3.02

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.95

3.66

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.49

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

4.36

-1.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.46

16.36

-5.90

IMRFX vs. CMTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMRFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is lower than the CMTFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMRFX and CMTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMRFXCMTFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

3.02

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.80

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

1.00

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.50

+0.12

Drawdowns

IMRFX vs. CMTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMRFX drawdown since its inception was -45.67%, smaller than the maximum CMTFX drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMRFX and CMTFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMRFXCMTFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.67%

-68.28%

+22.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-14.35%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.19%

-26.63%

+16.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.77%

-39.42%

+10.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.77%

-39.42%

+10.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-16.30%

+8.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

3.82%

-1.96%

Volatility

IMRFX vs. CMTFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Global Opportunities Fund (IMRFX) is 2.69%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that IMRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMRFXCMTFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

6.33%

-3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

16.68%

-8.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.37%

21.07%

-11.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.91%

25.98%

-15.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.42%

24.84%

-14.42%

IMRFX vs. CMTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMRFX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CMTFX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMRFX vs. CMTFX - Dividend Comparison

IMRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.72%, more than CMTFX's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMTFX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund
2.37%3.09%1.02%2.23%3.36%4.19%0.87%2.44%5.89%3.60%0.35%1.74%
IMRFX
Columbia Global Opportunities Fund
16.72%17.87%0.47%0.00%6.62%7.92%4.40%1.75%0.35%0.00%2.77%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMRFX and CMTFX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMTFX has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to IMRFX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMRFX dropped -45.67% vs CMTFX's -68.28%.

CMTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMRFX and CMTFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer