PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEY vs. HGER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEY vs. HGER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEY achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly lower than HGER's 20.51% return.


PEY

1D
0.22%
1M
4.89%
YTD
14.12%
6M
12.62%
1Y
18.95%
3Y*
10.61%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
8.58%

HGER

1D
0.37%
1M
-8.89%
YTD
20.51%
6M
21.54%
1Y
26.21%
3Y*
17.38%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEY vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PEY
Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF
14.12%0.56%5.25%7.29%-0.04%
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
20.51%20.08%9.25%1.93%9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PEY and HGER is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022

0.11

The correlation between PEY and HGER shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEY vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEY
PEY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEY Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEY Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

HGER
HGER Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEY vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEYHGERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.29

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.40

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.01

8.54

-2.53

PEY vs. HGER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the HGER Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEY and HGER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEY vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEY drawdown since its inception was -72.81%, which is greater than HGER's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEY and HGER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEYHGERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.81%

-23.31%

-49.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-10.97%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.90%

-10.97%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-10.64%

+8.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.85%

-7.66%

-5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.08%

+0.08%

Volatility

PEY vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison

Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) have volatilities of 3.75% and 3.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEYHGERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

3.63%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

14.84%

-5.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.07%

16.94%

-2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.37%

17.59%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.90%

17.59%

+1.31%

PEY vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEY has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEY vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison

PEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than HGER's 5.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
5.88%7.09%3.28%7.24%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PEY
Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF
4.43%4.85%4.44%4.58%4.22%3.83%4.30%3.78%4.33%3.21%3.12%3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEY and HGER have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEY has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to HGER (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEY dropped -72.81% vs HGER's -23.31%.

On 3-year performance, HGER leads with 17.38% vs 10.61% for PEY. On fees, PEY is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, HGER has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HGER has performed better with a 17.38% return vs 10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PEY is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HGER.

HGER has the higher dividend yield at 5.88%, compared with 4.43% for PEY.

PEY is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while HGER is Commodities. PEY tracks NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers 50 Index, while HGER tracks Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for PEY and 0.68% for HGER.

HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEY and HGER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer