PEXMX vs. PBDIX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund (PEXMX) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX).
PEXMX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jan 30, 1998. PBDIX is managed by T. Rowe Price.
Performance
PEXMX vs. PBDIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PEXMX vs. PBDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEXMX T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund | -1.37% | 14.64% | 16.72% | 25.32% | -26.15% | 12.09% | 30.80% | 32.57% | -9.61% | 16.63% |
PBDIX T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund | -0.12% | 10.63% | 1.96% | 5.47% | -14.24% | -1.45% | 8.17% | 8.69% | -0.01% | 3.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEXMX achieves a -1.37% return, which is significantly lower than PBDIX's -0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PEXMX has outperformed PBDIX with an annualized return of 11.32%, while PBDIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.04% annualized return.
PEXMX
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- -1.37%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 23.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
PBDIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 7.20%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PEXMX vs. PBDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PEXMX and PBDIX have an expense ratio of 0.23%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
PEXMX vs. PBDIX — Risk / Return Rank
PEXMX
PBDIX
PEXMX vs. PBDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund (PEXMX) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEXMX | PBDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 1.66 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 2.40 | -0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.30 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 2.68 | -1.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.09 | 8.52 | -3.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEXMX | PBDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.66 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.11 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.41 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.86 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between PEXMX and PBDIX is -0.18. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
PEXMX vs. PBDIX - Dividend Comparison
PEXMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, less than PBDIX's 7.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEXMX T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund | 7.18% | 7.08% | 7.64% | 3.64% | 7.53% | 14.87% | 2.99% | 8.17% | 6.67% | 4.50% | 5.90% | 4.81% |
PBDIX T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund | 7.40% | 7.33% | 4.48% | 3.49% | 2.01% | 1.84% | 3.59% | 3.18% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 2.82% | 2.99% |
Drawdowns
PEXMX vs. PBDIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEXMX drawdown since its inception was -57.82%, which is greater than PBDIX's maximum drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEXMX and PBDIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEXMX | PBDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.82% | -19.20% | -38.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.71% | -2.94% | -11.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.27% | -19.10% | -17.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.27% | -19.20% | -22.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.22% | -2.23% | -4.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.69% | -2.52% | -11.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.11% | 0.93% | +3.18% |
Volatility
PEXMX vs. PBDIX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund (PEXMX) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX) at 1.69%. This indicates that PEXMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PEXMX | PBDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | 1.69% | +5.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.00% | 2.93% | +11.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.55% | 4.71% | +18.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.52% | 6.02% | +16.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.23% | 4.98% | +17.25% |