PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEXMX vs. NEEGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEXMX vs. NEEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund (PEXMX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEXMX achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly lower than NEEGX's 59.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PEXMX has underperformed NEEGX with an annualized return of 12.22%, while NEEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.37% annualized return.


PEXMX

1D
1.08%
1M
5.79%
YTD
14.63%
6M
13.30%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
19.87%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
12.22%

NEEGX

1D
4.73%
1M
16.94%
YTD
59.35%
6M
56.93%
1Y
97.40%
3Y*
28.72%
5Y*
14.97%
10Y*
16.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEXMX vs. NEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEXMX
T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund
14.63%11.17%16.72%25.32%-26.15%12.09%30.80%32.57%-9.61%16.63%
NEEGX
Needham Growth Fund
59.35%8.76%14.45%26.85%-33.57%27.63%41.73%42.33%-10.56%8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between PEXMX and NEEGX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 1998

0.87

The correlation between PEXMX and NEEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEXMX vs. NEEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEXMX
PEXMX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PEXMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEXMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEXMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PEXMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEXMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

NEEGX
NEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
NEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEXMX vs. NEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund (PEXMX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEXMXNEEGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.56

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

7.75

-4.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.18

26.32

-15.15

PEXMX vs. NEEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEXMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the NEEGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEXMX and NEEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEXMXNEEGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

3.79

-1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.53

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.65

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.59

-0.19

Drawdowns

PEXMX vs. NEEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEXMX drawdown since its inception was -57.82%, which is greater than NEEGX's maximum drawdown of -53.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEXMX and NEEGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEXMXNEEGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.82%

-53.60%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.30%

-13.27%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.01%

-38.66%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.27%

-43.35%

+7.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.27%

-43.35%

+2.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-10.89%

-2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

3.90%

-1.02%

Volatility

PEXMX vs. NEEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund (PEXMX) is 4.68%, while Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) has a volatility of 9.71%. This indicates that PEXMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEXMXNEEGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

9.71%

-5.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.24%

20.91%

-7.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.49%

27.12%

-9.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.46%

28.30%

-5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.25%

25.29%

-3.04%

PEXMX vs. NEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEXMX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than NEEGX's 1.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEXMX vs. NEEGX - Dividend Comparison

PEXMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than NEEGX's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEEGX
Needham Growth Fund
4.75%7.57%3.92%0.00%1.78%6.92%5.73%11.31%17.79%9.70%4.22%6.74%
PEXMX
T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund
3.51%4.02%7.64%3.64%7.53%14.87%2.99%8.17%6.67%4.50%5.90%4.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEXMX and NEEGX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEEGX has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to PEXMX (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEXMX dropped -57.82% vs NEEGX's -53.60%.

NEEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.79 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEXMX and NEEGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer