PEXMX vs. MMGPX
PEXMX (T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund) and MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PEXMX returned 6.75%/yr vs -5.76%/yr for MMGPX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEXMX charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for MMGPX.
Performance
PEXMX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEXMX achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly higher than MMGPX's 0.41% return.
PEXMX
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- YTD
- 14.75%
- 1Y
- 22.16%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
MMGPX
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- 6M
- -5.17%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- -7.10%
- 3Y*
- 19.43%
- 5Y*
- -5.76%
- 10Y*
- —
PEXMX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEXMX T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund | 14.75% | 11.17% | 16.72% | 25.32% | -26.15% | 12.09% | 30.80% | 32.57% | -9.61% | 14.28% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.41% | 12.58% | 41.83% | 44.34% | -63.37% | -11.55% | 152.67% | 40.20% | 10.89% | 28.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEXMX and MMGPX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.76 |
The correlation between PEXMX and MMGPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEXMX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank
PEXMX
MMGPX
PEXMX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund (PEXMX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEXMX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.99 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | -0.21 | +2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.07 | -0.41 | +8.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEXMX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEXMX drawdown since its inception was -57.82%, smaller than the maximum MMGPX drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEXMX and MMGPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEXMX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.82% | -75.38% | +17.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.30% | -27.79% | +17.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.01% | -29.27% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.27% | -72.70% | +36.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -40.00% | +37.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.57% | -30.34% | +16.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 14.02% | -11.10% |
Volatility
PEXMX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund (PEXMX) is 4.92%, while Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that PEXMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEXMX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 6.97% | -2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.51% | 21.77% | -8.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.13% | 28.56% | -10.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 39.85% | -17.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.22% | 35.16% | -12.94% |
PEXMX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEXMX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PEXMX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison
PEXMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, while MMGPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 125.40% | 64.53% | 7.93% | 15.63% | 28.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEXMX T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund | 3.51% | 4.02% | 7.64% | 3.64% | 7.53% | 14.87% | 2.99% | 8.17% | 6.67% | 4.50% | 5.90% | 4.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEXMX and MMGPX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMGPX has higher volatility (6.97%) compared to PEXMX (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEXMX dropped -57.82% vs MMGPX's -75.38%.
PEXMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEXMX and MMGPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer