PEXL vs. TSME
PEXL (Pacer US Export Leaders ETF) and TSME (Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. PEXL is passively managed, while TSME is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PEXL returned 18.32%/yr vs 18.65%/yr for TSME. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PEXL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for TSME.
Performance
PEXL vs. TSME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEXL achieves a 19.24% return, which is significantly higher than TSME's 17.97% return.
PEXL
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- 6M
- 15.44%
- YTD
- 19.24%
- 1Y
- 35.62%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- —
TSME
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- 6M
- 11.83%
- YTD
- 17.97%
- 1Y
- 28.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEXL vs. TSME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 19.24% | 27.33% | 5.79% | 24.40% | 5.66% |
TSME Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF | 17.97% | 13.79% | 18.98% | 17.82% | 2.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEXL and TSME is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between PEXL and TSME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
PEXL vs. TSME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEXL
TSME
Technology
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PEXL
TSME
Communication Services
PEXL
TSME
-
Healthcare
PEXL
TSME
Industrials
PEXL
TSME
Consumer Defensive
PEXL
TSME
Basic Materials
PEXL
TSME
Consumer Cyclical
PEXL
TSME
Energy
PEXL
TSME
Financial Services
PEXL
-
TSME
Real Estate
PEXL
-
TSME
-
Utilities
PEXL
-
TSME
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEXL vs. TSME — Risk / Return Rank
PEXL
TSME
PEXL vs. TSME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) and Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEXL | TSME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.23 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 1.94 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.61 | 6.49 | +6.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEXL vs. TSME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEXL drawdown since its inception was -36.76%, which is greater than TSME's maximum drawdown of -26.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEXL and TSME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEXL | TSME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.76% | -26.59% | -10.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -14.72% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.72% | -26.59% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.15% | -6.21% | +2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -5.10% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 4.38% | -1.55% |
Volatility
PEXL vs. TSME - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) has a higher volatility of 8.72% compared to Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) at 7.88%. This indicates that PEXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEXL | TSME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.72% | 7.88% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.93% | 18.50% | -2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.95% | 22.41% | -2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 21.85% | +0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.14% | 21.85% | +2.29% |
PEXL vs. TSME - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEXL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than TSME's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEXL vs. TSME - Dividend Comparison
PEXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, more than TSME's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 0.30% | 0.44% | 0.48% | 0.48% | 0.60% | 0.22% | 0.48% | 0.49% | 0.29% |
TSME Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.38% | 0.53% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEXL and TSME have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEXL has higher volatility (8.72%) compared to TSME (7.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEXL dropped -36.76% vs TSME's -26.59%.
On 3-year performance, TSME leads with 18.65% vs 18.32% for PEXL. On fees, PEXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, TSME has been the lower-risk option at 7.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TSME has performed better with a 18.65% return vs 18.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PEXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TSME.
PEXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.14% for TSME.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PEXL and 0.65% for TSME.
PEXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEXL and TSME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer